* Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine
@ 2012-03-19 23:04 Chris Francy
2012-03-20 1:52 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Francy @ 2012-03-19 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I am seeing a different array size with mdadm --detail and --examine,
and I don't understand why.
I have seen this on a production systems, but I created an array in a
VM for testing purposes, and I am seeing the same results.
I have a 5 device RAID10 with created like so. It has 5 members 8GB
each. Which I believe should result in an array size of ~20GB.
mdadm -v --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean \
--level=raid10 --layout=o2 --raid-devices=5 \
--chunk=64 \
/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
mdadm --detail reports an array size of ~20GiB
root@debian:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Creation Time : Fri Mar 16 16:06:09 2012
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 20960960 (19.99 GiB 21.46 GB)
Used Dev Size : 8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
mdadm --examine reports an array size of ~16GiB
root@debian:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
/dev/sdb2:
Avail Dev Size : 16769024 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
Array Size : 33537536 (15.99 GiB 17.17 GB)
Used Dev Size : 16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
Most of my testing was done on a Debian squeeze system, but I manually
compiled and installed mdadm 3.2.3 and I also saw the same confusing
output from a Gentoo based livecd with a recent kernel.
The full output of the mdadm output is pasted available here.
http://paste.debian.net/160057/
The array in the VM seems to work fine, I was able to create a
filesystem and store data on it. But the output from the --examine is
confusing.
The same is true with the use Dev size `8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`
versus `16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`.
Chris Francy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine
2012-03-19 23:04 Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine Chris Francy
@ 2012-03-20 1:52 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-03-20 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Francy; +Cc: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2328 bytes --]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:04:34 -0700 Chris Francy <zoredache@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am seeing a different array size with mdadm --detail and --examine,
> and I don't understand why.
>
> I have seen this on a production systems, but I created an array in a
> VM for testing purposes, and I am seeing the same results.
>
> I have a 5 device RAID10 with created like so. It has 5 members 8GB
> each. Which I believe should result in an array size of ~20GB.
>
> mdadm -v --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean \
> --level=raid10 --layout=o2 --raid-devices=5 \
> --chunk=64 \
> /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
>
> mdadm --detail reports an array size of ~20GiB
>
> root@debian:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
> /dev/md0:
> Creation Time : Fri Mar 16 16:06:09 2012
> Raid Level : raid10
> Array Size : 20960960 (19.99 GiB 21.46 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
>
> mdadm --examine reports an array size of ~16GiB
>
> root@debian:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdd2 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2
> /dev/sdb2:
> Avail Dev Size : 16769024 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
> Array Size : 33537536 (15.99 GiB 17.17 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)
Thanks for the report.
There seems to be a rounding error in mdadm when calculating the size to
report for --examine. The value for --detail is of course correct.
I'll try to get it fixed in the next release.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Most of my testing was done on a Debian squeeze system, but I manually
> compiled and installed mdadm 3.2.3 and I also saw the same confusing
> output from a Gentoo based livecd with a recent kernel.
>
> The full output of the mdadm output is pasted available here.
> http://paste.debian.net/160057/
>
> The array in the VM seems to work fine, I was able to create a
> filesystem and store data on it. But the output from the --examine is
> confusing.
>
> The same is true with the use Dev size `8384384 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`
> versus `16768768 (8.00 GiB 8.59 GB)`.
>
> Chris Francy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-20 1:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-19 23:04 Array Size differences between mdadm --detail and --examine Chris Francy
2012-03-20 1:52 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).