From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Various cleanups and minor fixes
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:11:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120321081130.239d577a@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332262456-5109-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2015 bytes --]
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:54:05 +0100 Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch set implements a number of smaller cleanups, as well as
> fixing a couple of cases where we don't zero out the full buffer we
> just obtained via malloc.
All applied and push out - thanks. There were a few conflict which some
stuff I was working on, but nothing serious.
>
> The most controversial is probably patch 06 which caches the device
> block size for aligned read/writes in super1.c to avoid calling the
> ioctl() on each write.
Yeah, it's a bit ugly, but seems reasonable.
>
> I also introduced some generalized ROUND_UP macros to avoid the manual
> pointer and size manipulation in various places.
>
> The ddf code I am unable to test as I don't have any raids with ddf
> layout, but it does compile.
>
> Cheers,
> Jes
I think it might be nearly time for 3.2.4. Do you have any thoughts about
that?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
>
> Jes Sorensen (11):
> super1.c don't keep recalculating bitmap pointer
> Define and use SUPER1_SIZE for allocations
> init_super1() memset full buffer allocated for superblock
> match_metadata_desc1(): Use calloc instead of malloc+memset
> Use 4K buffer alignment for superblock allocations
> Use struct align_fd to cache fd's block size for aligned reads/writes
> match_metadata_desc0(): Use calloc instead of malloc+memset
> Generalize ROUND_UP() macro and introduce matching ROUND_UP_PTR()
> super1.c: use ROUND_UP/ROUND_UP_PTR
> super-intel.c: Use ROUND_UP() instead of manually coding it
> __write_init_super_ddf(): Use posix_memalign() instead of static
> aligned buffer
>
> mdadm.h | 8 ++--
> super-ddf.c | 19 ++++++----
> super-intel.c | 2 +-
> super0.c | 6 ++--
> super1.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-20 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-20 16:54 [PATCH 00/11] Various cleanups and minor fixes Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 01/11] super1.c don't keep recalculating bitmap pointer Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] Define and use SUPER1_SIZE for allocations Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] init_super1() memset full buffer allocated for superblock Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] match_metadata_desc1(): Use calloc instead of malloc+memset Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] Use 4K buffer alignment for superblock allocations Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] Use struct align_fd to cache fd's block size for aligned reads/writes Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] match_metadata_desc0(): Use calloc instead of malloc+memset Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] Generalize ROUND_UP() macro and introduce matching ROUND_UP_PTR() Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 09/11] super1.c: use ROUND_UP/ROUND_UP_PTR Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 10/11] super-intel.c: Use ROUND_UP() instead of manually coding it Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 16:54 ` [PATCH 11/11] __write_init_super_ddf(): Use posix_memalign() instead of static aligned buffer Jes.Sorensen
2012-03-20 21:11 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-03-21 7:58 ` [PATCH 00/11] Various cleanups and minor fixes Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120321081130.239d577a@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).