From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: RAID6 grow failed Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:54:25 +1000 Message-ID: <20120402095425.168e5d94@notabene.brown> References: <20120328151828.6988d3db@notabene.brown> <20120328192601.3db82133@notabene.brown> <20120401080036.355a8a23@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/8JdBfr6+9woQ0TPfGtJ_OIV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bryan Bush Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/8JdBfr6+9woQ0TPfGtJ_OIV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 03:05:29 -0400 Bryan Bush wrote: > Additional info that might be useful. When I specify which disks to > use in the array, I get this > root@diamond:/# mdadm -A --verbose /dev/md1 /dev/sd[onjlkuhedcb]1 > mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md1 > mdadm: /dev/sdb1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 4. > mdadm: /dev/sdc1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 5. > mdadm: /dev/sdd1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 6. > mdadm: /dev/sde1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 7. > mdadm: /dev/sdh1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 12. > mdadm: /dev/sdj1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 10. > mdadm: /dev/sdk1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 8. > mdadm: /dev/sdl1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 0. > mdadm: /dev/sdn1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 2. > mdadm: /dev/sdo1 is identified as a member of /dev/md1, slot 3. > mdadm: device 8 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but > /dev/sdk1 seems ok > mdadm: device 10 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but > /dev/sdj1 seems ok > mdadm: device 12 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but > /dev/sdh1 seems ok > mdadm: SET_ARRAY_INFO failed for /dev/md1: Device or resource busy > root@diamond:/# 1/ Are you absolutely certain you did mdadm -S /dev/md1 first? Because it really looks like you didn't. 2/ Any kernel log messages? dmesg | tail -n 50 immediately after the failed "mdadm -A" command. NeilBrown --Sig_/8JdBfr6+9woQ0TPfGtJ_OIV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBT3jqsjnsnt1WYoG5AQIAMQ//fevRgIo8GLhVb+j945+HA+JJu+MG6joC H4Fdxvw3BHtf5lM0vt1pgb94G+R1UAzU1L9uTSyUzsFHZ4pX8vOwaq8pjWCTBeO1 FKsS+PibXmjgbAMR2f7MjaAE+zfjWWvy6zEzm039zd50Qq2N/JlSVq13XLdmDHPZ u7Mf1onVuMbR7ghKeopiMiug515QOfz6mLTyadQLze19/iMMYkPQDUFpCKnJzrmo JFUb7LmCycs/q6+ZpF+wGxALLa1HVVY947OSMhAAjILwFSwazNqV+p1LRITI4dk2 IW/sST0aowKkihyCSG8dPBuwEfE3pq7JDlkfqSMJL63fJh9LTimBIx3bz1a8yrCP 0nLhDNCVcGWYEEk65TO+KRQ//cNoYtQADpEZuqvuufiARGia6FW0xGwjWSlSWHuY I8L2JeMNXZ6ncfAgfs5uccOTv2FvkY7nLKKRmppznBJB6aQ5D6kbVN+SMeFx4dVA bDWvrtA8sYtMTKsifxCcmTe7twBr09Y/qPVGzOgSkItZyQ9U5DOG1tow6vNB1oDx vEPTsjh8G7sARpxEsMv9s8OQg/BvbmDRmWbbZA3gXVElyKQsipN6nRBrBiASsIoM +cgVhekp38rHh9iHnbGmlCZsslERzsjrOdVXQHpIwMz+4MyldwG23TWHvXgaNdiZ nHCsDKmtn74= =072h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8JdBfr6+9woQ0TPfGtJ_OIV--