From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: md/raid1:Remove unnecessary judgement.
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:25:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120402112543.4d5b0abe@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203311005202344147@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1235 bytes --]
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:05:23 +0800 "majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> >From 033a0330eb210750ec09202ed95696b54d9afeba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:57:42 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] md/raid1:Remove unnecessary judgement.
> If success == 1 then break the do{}while,so did not judge !success.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 4a40a20..649941b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@ static int fix_sync_read_error(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
> d++;
> if (d == conf->raid_disks * 2)
> d = 0;
> - } while (!success && d != r1_bio->read_disk);
> + } while (d != r1_bio->read_disk);
>
> if (!success) {
> char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
This is another micro-optimisation that doesn't really buy us anything.
I actually like the fact that the 'while' condition makes it clear that lot
loop doesn't continue after we reach 'success'. So I think I'll leave it the
way it is.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 2:05 md/raid1:Remove unnecessary judgement majianpeng
2012-04-02 1:25 ` NeilBrown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120402112543.4d5b0abe@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).