* doubt in chunk_aligned_read()
@ 2012-04-05 1:25 Anuj Goel
2012-04-05 1:38 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj Goel @ 2012-04-05 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RAID
HI Guys,
Why is the below call needed in the function chunk_aligned_read()
align_bi = bio_clone_mddev(raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
Why do we need to create a clone of the bio passed to
chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ??
--
Best Regards,
Anuj Goel
Experimental Computer Science Lab
Stony Brook University.
Cell: +1-801-209-5873
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: doubt in chunk_aligned_read()
2012-04-05 1:25 doubt in chunk_aligned_read() Anuj Goel
@ 2012-04-05 1:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-05 1:56 ` Anuj Goel
2012-04-08 19:47 ` Anuj Goel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-04-05 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anuj Goel; +Cc: Linux RAID
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 751 bytes --]
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:25:53 -0400 Anuj Goel <talk2anuj@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI Guys,
>
> Why is the below call needed in the function chunk_aligned_read()
>
> align_bi = bio_clone_mddev(raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
>
> Why do we need to create a clone of the bio passed to
> chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ??
Think about what happens if the read fails.
NeilBrown
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Anuj Goel
> Experimental Computer Science Lab
> Stony Brook University.
> Cell: +1-801-209-5873
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: doubt in chunk_aligned_read()
2012-04-05 1:38 ` NeilBrown
@ 2012-04-05 1:56 ` Anuj Goel
2012-04-08 19:47 ` Anuj Goel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj Goel @ 2012-04-05 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown; +Cc: Linux RAID
cool :)
Thanks !!
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:38 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:25:53 -0400 Anuj Goel <talk2anuj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HI Guys,
>>
>> Why is the below call needed in the function chunk_aligned_read()
>>
>> align_bi = bio_clone_mddev(raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
>>
>> Why do we need to create a clone of the bio passed to
>> chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ??
>
> Think about what happens if the read fails.
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Anuj Goel
>> Experimental Computer Science Lab
>> Stony Brook University.
>> Cell: +1-801-209-5873
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Best Regards,
Anuj Goel
Experimental Computer Science Lab
Stony Brook University.
Cell: +1-801-209-5873
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: doubt in chunk_aligned_read()
2012-04-05 1:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-05 1:56 ` Anuj Goel
@ 2012-04-08 19:47 ` Anuj Goel
2012-04-08 23:29 ` NeilBrown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj Goel @ 2012-04-08 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown; +Cc: Linux RAID
Thanks for the hint !!
I have few more doubts in the function,
static int chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
if all the preliminary checks pass, we increment active_aligned_reads
and call generic_make_request() which will add this bio to the
"current->bio_list".
This being an asynchronous read, chunk_aligned_read returns and the
result of the read will be notified by the registered callback
function "raid5_align_endio".
Based on this understanding, I have some questions below:
1. How and when is the read from the disk initiated ?
2. The bio passed to raid5_align_endio() is the one which was cloned
in chunk_aligned read(). The below statement in raid5_align_endio()
extracts the original bio :
struct bio* raid_bi = bi->bi_private;
My doubt is in the assignment,
rdev = (void*)raid_bi->bi_next;
raid_bi is the original bio and its bi_next field should have been
pointing to the next bio in the request queue "current->bio_list" (if
active_aligned_reads is > 0 ). How can this point to a rdev structure
? Or better put, where do we make the bio->bi_next point to a rdev
struct ?
3. after this, we have,
i) mddev = rdev->mddev;
ii) conf = mddev->private;
iii) rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
In the call in line iii) we could have just sent the mddev retrieved
in line i). I am curious if there is a specific reason for reading it
again from the raid configuration struct "conf" ? Could there be a
case when mddev in line i) can be different from the conf->mddev in
line iii) ??
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:38 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:25:53 -0400 Anuj Goel <talk2anuj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> HI Guys,
>>
>> Why is the below call needed in the function chunk_aligned_read()
>>
>> align_bi = bio_clone_mddev(raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
>>
>> Why do we need to create a clone of the bio passed to
>> chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ??
>
> Think about what happens if the read fails.
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Anuj Goel
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Best Regards,
Anuj Goel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: doubt in chunk_aligned_read()
2012-04-08 19:47 ` Anuj Goel
@ 2012-04-08 23:29 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-04-08 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anuj Goel; +Cc: Linux RAID
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3193 bytes --]
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:47:01 -0400 Anuj Goel <talk2anuj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the hint !!
>
> I have few more doubts in the function,
>
> static int chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio)
>
> if all the preliminary checks pass, we increment active_aligned_reads
> and call generic_make_request() which will add this bio to the
> "current->bio_list".
> This being an asynchronous read, chunk_aligned_read returns and the
> result of the read will be notified by the registered callback
> function "raid5_align_endio".
> Based on this understanding, I have some questions below:
>
> 1. How and when is the read from the disk initiated ?
When the original q->make_request_fn call into raid5 returns,
generic_make_request will notice the request on current->bio_list
(bio_list_pop will pop it off) and its ->make_request_fn will be called.
>
> 2. The bio passed to raid5_align_endio() is the one which was cloned
> in chunk_aligned read(). The below statement in raid5_align_endio()
> extracts the original bio :
> struct bio* raid_bi = bi->bi_private;
> My doubt is in the assignment,
> rdev = (void*)raid_bi->bi_next;
> raid_bi is the original bio and its bi_next field should have been
> pointing to the next bio in the request queue "current->bio_list" (if
> active_aligned_reads is > 0 ). How can this point to a rdev structure
> ? Or better put, where do we make the bio->bi_next point to a rdev
> struct ?
When ->make_request_fn is called, bi_next must be NULL. It will no longer be
on the current->bio_list (it was popped off if it was ever on).
See:
raid_bio->bi_next = (void*)rdev;
in chunk_aligned_read. Note that raid_bio doesn't get added to
current->bio_list, align_bi does. So the rdev on raid_bi->bi_next is safe.
>
> 3. after this, we have,
> i) mddev = rdev->mddev;
> ii) conf = mddev->private;
> iii) rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
> In the call in line iii) we could have just sent the mddev retrieved
> in line i). I am curious if there is a specific reason for reading it
> again from the raid configuration struct "conf" ? Could there be a
> case when mddev in line i) can be different from the conf->mddev in
> line iii) ??
No. Just clumsy coding.
iii should be
rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
NeilBrown
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:38 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:25:53 -0400 Anuj Goel <talk2anuj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> HI Guys,
> >>
> >> Why is the below call needed in the function chunk_aligned_read()
> >>
> >> align_bi = bio_clone_mddev(raid_bio, GFP_NOIO, mddev);
> >>
> >> Why do we need to create a clone of the bio passed to
> >> chunk_aligned_read(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * raid_bio) ??
> >
> > Think about what happens if the read fails.
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Anuj Goel
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-08 23:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-05 1:25 doubt in chunk_aligned_read() Anuj Goel
2012-04-05 1:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-05 1:56 ` Anuj Goel
2012-04-08 19:47 ` Anuj Goel
2012-04-08 23:29 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).