From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: arch/86: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:14:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411061442.2f839c77@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F846FBC.9060503@zytor.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 975 bytes --]
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:37:00 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 10:22 AM, Jim Kukunas wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > The following patch adds an AVX implementation of the RAID5 xor checksumming
> > functions.
> >
> > Based on xor_speed, the AVX implementation appears to be ~32% faster than the
> > SSE implementation on my i7 2600:
> >
> > generic_sse: 15088.000 MB/sec
> > avx: 19936.000 MB/sec
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I think this (and the SSSE3 patches for RAID-6) should go in via the
> RAID tree. Neil, do you agree?
I'm happy to take the SSSE3 RAID-6 patches as they only affect lib/raid6, but
I felt that this one - being purely in arch/x86 - should probably go via the
x86 tree.
However I'm flexible and if you (collectively) are happy with these patches
going in through my tree, I'll do that.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> However,
>
> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
>
> -hpa
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1334078551-6859-1-git-send-email-james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
2012-04-10 17:37 ` arch/86: AVX RAID5 xor checksumming H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-10 20:14 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-04-10 21:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-14 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120411061442.2f839c77@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).