From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dmesg deluge: RAID1 conf printout
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:48:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423094853.15683cd6@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F943E07.8040206@computer.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3267 bytes --]
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:21:11 +0200 Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
wrote:
> NeilBrown wrote:
> > Looks like:
> >
> > commit 7bfec5f35c68121e7b1849f3f4166dd96c8da5b3
> >
> > is at fault. It causes md to attempt to add spares into the array more often.
> > Would I be right in guessing that you have one spare in this array?
> > If you remove the spare, the messages should stop.
>
> Hmmm. The commit message is as follows:
>
> commit 7bfec5f35c68121e7b1849f3f4166dd96c8da5b3
> Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Date: Fri Dec 23 10:17:53 2011 +1100
>
> md/raid5: If there is a spare and a want_replacement device, start
> replaceme
>
> When attempting to add a spare to a RAID[456] array, also consider
> adding it as a replacement for a want_replacement device.
>
> This requires that common md code attempt hot_add even when the array
> is not formally degraded.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
>
>
> Does this also apply to RAID1 (which is all I've got on this machine: no
> RAID456)?
Yes it does apply to RAID1. Part of the patch was RAID5-specific but part of
it was to common code that would affect other levels. That part was not
meant to be a big change, but it turned out to be a little bigger than I
expected.
The following should fix it.
Thanks again for the report,
NeilBrown
From 321f820a905993f694f7ba4347492e9273831813 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:46:28 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] md: don't call ->add_disk unless there is good reason.
Commit 7bfec5f35c68121e7b18
md/raid5: If there is a spare and a want_replacement device, start replacement.
cause md_check_recovery to call ->add_disk much more often.
Instead of only when the array is degraded, it is now called whenever
md_check_recovery finds anything useful to do, which includes
updating the metadata for clean<->dirty transition.
This causes unnecessary work, and causes info messages from ->add_disk
to be reported much too often.
So refine md_check_recovery to only do any actual recovery checking
(including ->add_disk) if MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED is set.
This fix is suitable for 3.3.y:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 9524192..47f1fdb6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7813,14 +7813,14 @@ void md_check_recovery(struct mddev *mddev)
* any transients in the value of "sync_action".
*/
set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
- clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
/* Clear some bits that don't mean anything, but
* might be left set
*/
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery);
clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_DONE, &mddev->recovery);
- if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery))
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery) ||
+ test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery))
goto unlock;
/* no recovery is running.
* remove any failed drives, then
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-22 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-21 13:55 dmesg deluge: RAID1 conf printout Jan Ceuleers
2012-04-21 21:00 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-22 8:17 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-04-22 17:21 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-04-22 23:48 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-04-23 7:01 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-04-27 1:30 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120423094853.15683cd6@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@computer.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).