linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reason for md raid1 max_sectors_kb limited to 127?
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:18:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507211846.789d5808@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FA798D7.4070506@profitbricks.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 915 bytes --]

On Mon, 07 May 2012 11:41:43 +0200 Sebastian Riemer
<sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
> 
> I'm wondering why max_sectors_kb is set to 127 with md raid1.
> This value is at 512 on normal HDDs.
> 
> If I do a file copy on ext4 on a normal HDD then I can see with
> blktrace/blkparse that 128 KiB chunks are read and 512 KiB chunks are
> written.
> 
> With md raid it looks like this: 124 KiB, 4 KiB, 124 KiB, 4 KiB, ... .
> This looks very inefficient.
> 
> So, is there a particular reason that max_sectors_kb is set to 127?
> 
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
> 

You didn't say which kernel you are running.

However md/raid1 bases all those settings on the minimum or maximum (as
appropriate) of the setting of the underlying devices, using blk_stack_limits
(in block/blk-settings.c).

So the likely answer is that one of your HDDs has a smaller max_sectors_kb?

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-07 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07  9:41 Reason for md raid1 max_sectors_kb limited to 127? Sebastian Riemer
2012-05-07 11:18 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-05-07 11:34   ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-05-07 14:04     ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-07 14:14       ` Sebastian Riemer
     [not found]         ` <CABYL=ToyVwRGOkVs63iBgfWeTsjDQ=ofsYC4hgAVpABrWbHUjA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-07 14:47           ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-07 15:33             ` Sebastian Riemer
2012-05-07 16:13               ` Bernd Schubert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-08 16:07 Sebastian Riemer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120507211846.789d5808@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.riemer@profitbricks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).