Re: Yet another corrupt raid5

[NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1315 bytes --]

On Sun, 06 May 2012 11:21:15 +0200 Philipp Wendler <ml@philippwendler.de>
wrote:

> So I did it, and it worked out fine on the first try.
> Luks could successfully decrypt it, fsck did not complain, mounting
> worked and data is also fine. So hurrayy and big thanks ;-)
> Now I am running the resync.

Good news!  thanks for letting us know.

> 
> >> Thank you very much in advance for your help.
> > 
> > Good luck, and please accept my apologies for the bug that resulted in this
> > unfortunate situation.
> 
> Hey, you don't need to apologize. I am a software developer as well, and
> I know that such things might happen. And it didn't crash my data, so
> everything is fine.
> 
> On the contrary, I want to thank all the developers here that you do all
> this work I can use for free (in both senses) and now when there was a
> problem, I could ask on this list and get such a extensive and helpful
> answer, although I am this "yet another guy" that asks something for the
> x-th time.

I find "Do unto other what you would have others do to you" to be a very good
idea.

And the more I can encourage people to test my development code and report
bugs, the more bugs I can fix before they get to paying customers - and that
is certainly a good thing :-)

Thanks,
NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]