From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: Hi! Is "container" more efficient in terms of I/O op. numbers ... Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:14:24 +1000 Message-ID: <20120525101424.3cb40eb2@notabene.brown> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/gdauL3H_rzdGu8+4/iY2tVV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: for.poige+linux@gmail.com Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/gdauL3H_rzdGu8+4/iY2tVV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 24 May 2012 23:30:54 +0800 Igor Podlesny wrote: > ... then several "stand-alone" RAIDs on the same HDDs? -- Say, when > using write intent bitmaps. >=20 I'm not sure you question exactly makes sense, but the answer would be "no" if it did :-) NeilBrown --Sig_/gdauL3H_rzdGu8+4/iY2tVV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBT77O5jnsnt1WYoG5AQJ0Fg//bMtldx4rM3SLJ1k9DjI9VtnIYDt2/3S9 N8q9tJVnNv22g9qpto73dfDxj9uuaUUo4u8DyZyKO/2rAtb6hA4OjFF9zV7OmQd4 SyCe+miIczeeyCBOTOgzvRTL9utNDUb1S1QXo7wQSXo1JImZIoboZ2LxQ7K2KhbU ZBBtc9MpiHvMf8Xf7AYpbPnNO+mPqx5+MNxv+79LeYX/+PwROVTmpqfgg4rfWILW n+Juh8GEcxaSPAh1zTdbGStDglO0/Km9/EBAA/V5jt8LhW+1Igw+lVF2j6mKUhhG h602+1gbnUPeZ5FMopmpeN/c2zONQWnRne0CG3+W9QI/3o8/5PZFGKRUawIYryYd 5m2/90vlXvdAIsDUE1aJLOHQfSCuizEDdnx69ymVByhoLlGiKnDTGLFSbdUYsHrX HJAxjd/iERyl6qgmq2p8G1oOMAvFaURD1HaMDn+diKXq6mkBElEBeoOOsW1ze1mH kDpcoVFeXU3Bhei/77xvaBAi6P3oaNsEgyUahhw/vhRL50HST6+b7HWf8D1BDdLE nMPyHNiAsJ1l5f+mk0hJxz68gCtVlbIy1VN2xtrPLRvu/7AiXZUr4UopY5IYUnQW Cu9pu9G23sblw9raVYPmpro5+RhdjWrd6yx6X0gCUk1apwMcfJbaCa2x5EJ4n/U7 lkL/zHegHmM= =O+hG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gdauL3H_rzdGu8+4/iY2tVV--