From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
shli@fusionio.com
Subject: [patch 6/8] raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:01:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120604080335.029329200@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120604080152.098975870@kernel.org
[-- Attachment #1: raid5-make_request-relase_stripe-batch.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2622 bytes --]
make_request() does stripe release for every stripe and the stripe usually has
count 1, which makes previous release_stripe() optimization not work. In my
test, this release_stripe() becomes the heaviest pleace to take
conf->device_lock after previous patches applied.
Below patch makes stripe release batch. When maxium strips of a batch reach,
the batch will be flushed out. Another way to do the flush is when unplug is
called.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 14:13:46.846909398 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 14:22:07.944611949 +0800
@@ -4023,6 +4023,38 @@ static struct stripe_head *__get_priorit
return sh;
}
+struct raid5_plug {
+ struct blk_plug_cb cb;
+ struct stripe_head_batch batch;
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct raid5_plug, raid5_plugs);
+
+static void raid5_do_plug(struct blk_plug_cb *cb)
+{
+ struct raid5_plug *plug = container_of(cb, struct raid5_plug, cb);
+
+ release_stripe_flush_batch(&plug->batch);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&plug->cb.list);
+}
+
+static void release_stripe_plug(struct stripe_head *sh)
+{
+ struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
+ struct raid5_plug *raid5_plug;
+
+ if (!plug) {
+ release_stripe(sh);
+ return;
+ }
+ preempt_disable();
+ raid5_plug = &__raw_get_cpu_var(raid5_plugs);
+ release_stripe_add_batch(&raid5_plug->batch, sh);
+
+ if (list_empty(&raid5_plug->cb.list))
+ list_add(&raid5_plug->cb.list, &plug->cb_list);
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
static void make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
{
struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
@@ -4153,7 +4185,7 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *m
if ((bi->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC) &&
!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state))
atomic_inc(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
- release_stripe(sh);
+ release_stripe_plug(sh);
} else {
/* cannot get stripe for read-ahead, just give-up */
clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bi->bi_flags);
@@ -6170,6 +6202,14 @@ static struct md_personality raid4_perso
static int __init raid5_init(void)
{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_present_cpu(i) {
+ struct raid5_plug *plug = &per_cpu(raid5_plugs, i);
+ plug->batch.count = 0;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&plug->cb.list);
+ plug->cb.callback = raid5_do_plug;
+ }
register_md_personality(&raid6_personality);
register_md_personality(&raid5_personality);
register_md_personality(&raid4_personality);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-04 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 8:01 [patch 0/8] raid5: improve write performance for fast storage Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 1/8] raid5: add a per-stripe lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 0:54 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:29 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 6:35 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:52 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:02 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13 4:23 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:10 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 2/8] raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:06 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-12 20:41 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 3/8] raid5: remove some device_lock locking places Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 4/8] raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 0:50 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 5/8] raid5: add batch stripe release Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-06-07 1:23 ` [patch 6/8] raid5: make_request use " NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:33 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 7:33 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 7:58 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08 6:16 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08 6:42 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 7/8] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:32 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:35 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 7:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:02 ` [patch 8/8] raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:45 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-13 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-21 10:09 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 20:43 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120604080335.029329200@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).