linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, shli@fusionio.com
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:32:39 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120607113239.6a64b64d@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120604080344.262680737@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2708 bytes --]

On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:01:59 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:

> Let raid5d handle stripe in batch way to reduce conf->device_lock locking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>

I like this.
I don't think it justifies a separate function.

#define MAX_STRIPE_BATCH 8
struct stripe_head *batch[MAX_STRIPE_BATCH]
int batch_size = 0;

...

while (batch_size < MAX_STRPE_BATCH &&
       (sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf)) != NULL)
     batch[batch_size++] = sh;

spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
if (batch_size == 0)
     break;

handled += batch_size;

for (i = 0; i < batch_size; i++)
     handle_stripe(batch[i]);
cond_resched();
if (....) md_check_recovery(mddev);

spin_lock_irq(&conf->lock);
for (i = 0; i < batch_size; i++)
     __release_stripe(batch[i]);


something like that?

Thanks,
NeilBrown



> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c	2012-06-01 14:34:03.987606911 +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c	2012-06-01 14:49:26.388010973 +0800
> @@ -4585,6 +4585,22 @@ static int  retry_aligned_read(struct r5
>  	return handled;
>  }
>  
> +static int __get_stripe_batch(struct r5conf *conf,
> +		struct stripe_head_batch *batch)
> +{
> +	struct stripe_head *sh;
> +
> +	batch->count = 0;
> +	do {
> +		sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf);
> +		if (sh) {
> +			batch->stripes[batch->count] = sh;
> +			batch->count++;
> +		}
> +	} while (sh && batch->count < MAX_STRIPE_BATCH);
> +
> +	return batch->count;
> +}
>  
>  /*
>   * This is our raid5 kernel thread.
> @@ -4595,10 +4611,10 @@ static int  retry_aligned_read(struct r5
>   */
>  static void raid5d(struct mddev *mddev)
>  {
> -	struct stripe_head *sh;
>  	struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
> -	int handled;
> +	int handled, i;
>  	struct blk_plug plug;
> +	struct stripe_head_batch batch;
>  
>  	pr_debug("+++ raid5d active\n");
>  
> @@ -4633,15 +4649,16 @@ static void raid5d(struct mddev *mddev)
>  			handled++;
>  		}
>  
> -		sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf);
> -
> -		if (!sh)
> +		if (!__get_stripe_batch(conf, &batch))
>  			break;
>  		spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> -		
> -		handled++;
> -		handle_stripe(sh);
> -		release_stripe(sh);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < batch.count; i++) {
> +			handled++;
> +			handle_stripe(batch.stripes[i]);
> +		}
> +
> +		release_stripe_flush_batch(&batch);
>  		cond_resched();
>  
>  		if (mddev->flags & ~(1<<MD_CHANGE_PENDING))


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-07  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04  8:01 [patch 0/8] raid5: improve write performance for fast storage Shaohua Li
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 1/8] raid5: add a per-stripe lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  0:54   ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07  6:29     ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  6:35       ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07  6:52         ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:02           ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13  4:08             ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13  4:23               ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:10   ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 2/8] raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  1:06   ` NeilBrown
2012-06-12 20:41     ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 3/8] raid5: remove some device_lock locking places Shaohua Li
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 4/8] raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  0:50   ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 5/8] raid5: add batch stripe release Shaohua Li
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 6/8] raid5: make_request use " Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  1:23   ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07  6:33     ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  7:33       ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07  7:58         ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08  6:16           ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08  6:42             ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04  8:01 ` [patch 7/8] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  1:32   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-06-07  6:35     ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  7:38       ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04  8:02 ` [patch 8/8] raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes Shaohua Li
2012-06-07  1:39   ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07  6:45     ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-13  4:08       ` Dan Williams
2012-06-21 10:09         ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 20:43           ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120607113239.6a64b64d@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fusionio.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).