From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, shli@fusionio.com
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:32:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120607113239.6a64b64d@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120604080344.262680737@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2708 bytes --]
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:01:59 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:
> Let raid5d handle stripe in batch way to reduce conf->device_lock locking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
I like this.
I don't think it justifies a separate function.
#define MAX_STRIPE_BATCH 8
struct stripe_head *batch[MAX_STRIPE_BATCH]
int batch_size = 0;
...
while (batch_size < MAX_STRPE_BATCH &&
(sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf)) != NULL)
batch[batch_size++] = sh;
spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
if (batch_size == 0)
break;
handled += batch_size;
for (i = 0; i < batch_size; i++)
handle_stripe(batch[i]);
cond_resched();
if (....) md_check_recovery(mddev);
spin_lock_irq(&conf->lock);
for (i = 0; i < batch_size; i++)
__release_stripe(batch[i]);
something like that?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 14:34:03.987606911 +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-06-01 14:49:26.388010973 +0800
> @@ -4585,6 +4585,22 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5
> return handled;
> }
>
> +static int __get_stripe_batch(struct r5conf *conf,
> + struct stripe_head_batch *batch)
> +{
> + struct stripe_head *sh;
> +
> + batch->count = 0;
> + do {
> + sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf);
> + if (sh) {
> + batch->stripes[batch->count] = sh;
> + batch->count++;
> + }
> + } while (sh && batch->count < MAX_STRIPE_BATCH);
> +
> + return batch->count;
> +}
>
> /*
> * This is our raid5 kernel thread.
> @@ -4595,10 +4611,10 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5
> */
> static void raid5d(struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> - struct stripe_head *sh;
> struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
> - int handled;
> + int handled, i;
> struct blk_plug plug;
> + struct stripe_head_batch batch;
>
> pr_debug("+++ raid5d active\n");
>
> @@ -4633,15 +4649,16 @@ static void raid5d(struct mddev *mddev)
> handled++;
> }
>
> - sh = __get_priority_stripe(conf);
> -
> - if (!sh)
> + if (!__get_stripe_batch(conf, &batch))
> break;
> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> -
> - handled++;
> - handle_stripe(sh);
> - release_stripe(sh);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < batch.count; i++) {
> + handled++;
> + handle_stripe(batch.stripes[i]);
> + }
> +
> + release_stripe_flush_batch(&batch);
> cond_resched();
>
> if (mddev->flags & ~(1<<MD_CHANGE_PENDING))
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 8:01 [patch 0/8] raid5: improve write performance for fast storage Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 1/8] raid5: add a per-stripe lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 0:54 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:29 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 6:35 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:52 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:02 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-13 4:23 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-12 21:10 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 2/8] raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:06 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-12 20:41 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 3/8] raid5: remove some device_lock locking places Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 4/8] raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 0:50 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 5/8] raid5: add batch stripe release Shaohua Li
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 6/8] raid5: make_request use " Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:23 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:33 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 7:33 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 7:58 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08 6:16 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-08 6:42 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:01 ` [patch 7/8] raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-06-07 6:35 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 7:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-04 8:02 ` [patch 8/8] raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes Shaohua Li
2012-06-07 1:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-07 6:45 ` Shaohua Li
2012-06-13 4:08 ` Dan Williams
2012-06-21 10:09 ` Shaohua Li
2012-07-02 20:43 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120607113239.6a64b64d@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).