linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] md/raid5:When exec md_wait_for_blocked_rdev in ops_run_io,we must atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending).
@ 2012-06-11  3:23 majianpeng
  2012-06-27  2:21 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-06-11  3:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid

In ops_run_io(), if call md_wait_for_blocked_rdev which it dec
nr_pending, the rdev->nr_pending will dec again in else-statement.
So the nr_penging is error and we can't remove this device.

Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index d267672..995b2de 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -607,6 +607,12 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
 					md_check_recovery(conf->mddev);
 				}
 				md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(rdev, conf->mddev);
+				/*
+				 * Because md_wait_for_blocked_rdev will dec
+				 * nr_pending,we must add.The real dec is in
+				 * else statement.
+				 */
+				atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
 			} else {
 				/* Acknowledged bad block - skip the write */
 				rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
-- 
1.7.5.4



--------------
majianpeng

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] md/raid5:When exec md_wait_for_blocked_rdev in ops_run_io,we must atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending).
  2012-06-11  3:23 [PATCH] md/raid5:When exec md_wait_for_blocked_rdev in ops_run_io,we must atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending) majianpeng
@ 2012-06-27  2:21 ` NeilBrown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-06-27  2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: majianpeng; +Cc: linux-raid

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1316 bytes --]

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:23:56 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:

> In ops_run_io(), if call md_wait_for_blocked_rdev which it dec
> nr_pending, the rdev->nr_pending will dec again in else-statement.
> So the nr_penging is error and we can't remove this device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid5.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index d267672..995b2de 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -607,6 +607,12 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
>  					md_check_recovery(conf->mddev);
>  				}
>  				md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(rdev, conf->mddev);
> +				/*
> +				 * Because md_wait_for_blocked_rdev will dec
> +				 * nr_pending,we must add.The real dec is in
> +				 * else statement.
> +				 */
> +				atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
>  			} else {
>  				/* Acknowledged bad block - skip the write */
>  				rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);

Thanks for catching this.

I have moved the 'atomic_inc' to before 'md_wait_for_blocked_rdev'
to make sure that the nr_pending count never goes to zero, and I tidied
up the comment a little.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-27  2:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-11  3:23 [PATCH] md/raid5:When exec md_wait_for_blocked_rdev in ops_run_io,we must atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending) majianpeng
2012-06-27  2:21 ` NeilBrown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).