From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz Subject: Re: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: kernel BUG at ... build/source_i386_none/drivers/md/raid5.c:2764! Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20120627141231.GA10741@calhariz.com> References: <20120622121953.GA25149@calhariz.com> <20120624182146.7d63fbbb@notabene.brown> <20120624170234.GA13154@calhariz.com> <20120625123906.2c302212@notabene.brown> <20120625115833.71190b7e@batzmaru.gol.ad.jp> <20120625164230.2ba8f72c@notabene.brown> <20120625105903.GA6005@calhariz.com> Reply-To: jose.spam@netvisao.pt Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: CoolCold Cc: jose.spam@netvisao.pt, NeilBrown , Christian Balzer , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:27:25PM +0400, CoolCold wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz < > jose.spam@netvisao.pt> wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:42:30PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:58:33 +0900 Christian Balzer > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:39:06 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:02:34 +0100 Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:21:46PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:19:53 +0100 Jose Manuel dos Santos > > Calhariz > > > > > > > wrote: (...) > > > > > > Ok. > > > So the version number reported by "uname -a" doesn't change when you > > upgrade > > > a Debian kernel? That's rather sad. > > > I means that one has to take the reporters work for which kernel was > > running > > > rather than looking in the oops message for where the kernels tells me > > > what version it was. > > > > > > Given the report, it is entirely possible that an older kernel was > > running > > > while a newer kernel was installed. > > > > > > Jose: how certain are you that the kernel that was running at the time > > was > > > exactly the kernel that was installed at the time. i.e. you had not > > > performed a software update since the last reboot? > > > > > > > > Whenever I reboot a server I run a script to collect information about > > it: Kernel boot messages, kernel version, kernel modules, md raid > > information, etc. > > > Can you share this script ? (github will be perfect) Yes I can,tThe URL is:=20 https://github.com/calhariz/sysinfoupdate.git Expect some rough edges and I hope the code is self-explanatory. If not I am available for some explanation and patches are well come. >=20 >=20 > > (...) Jose Calhariz --=20 -- "Existem 3 poderes soberanos: Deus no c=E9u, o Papa no Vaticano e Dad=E1 Maravilha na grande =E1rea." --Dad=E1 Maravilha --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP6xTOAAoJEDSKd41ohe+PIKQQAKx0IXfc2ziQVHZFml6cFmyO EBfgfBUKWZSaYt88pdvaIGkE/Dm9zLpARR6QhDzykKdcPC8huobNssbInNPhm3oA GTXQ1VnjWdiXiIvoItJ5lVROZkoK4f9083dNf+jU1dicpGEOObHwXWUlSYniY2qC E6bU3tjKu28v/BTN3aHLB5GxwLVr6cNPVJiiLT+tZy7AoIallAJFq3qOJmjqJ1f4 m2LLb4RucRsmI6fNkADPTbzaLIbn99lcVO34McK+GhJKN2/SAUBGTdYp85YnJH4N tvHnMJfpqMUl2cQciMjCdczLmBAEA5jRhK1QbjYhC170vglvSfSg83TA7IhkNQcm Wc1W6tJEDI/yv8k9GukDxVGSIj2dKMoHirVYThOmSGsC6gvdEhkQNTeNEe1LBZ4k tddcmnjukH0beuybAKS2CgDGXrJLSQoK5LixYx6/QNAciZrs2FYrcC0uOL4CLKEN c7/UPerVs5dfsUMuJmz0YStKGNGXSVYggpTD5Tbyv7Pjom50y3xUZ1kPoVpeeM0/ Qwpny3WzwGyYOZAXmbzouzyzZD5qBRDwki3SRJbyg4R1HQiyv1fC2i9CyGA2/kiF ZxTVfnxDAnJ9+THKaffRF1GOBm5y/Lbze0cJLyK1HwvLhwl4lnjv13fczSihTQ2t E6qj+DWDj9sUXDolrZZe =iHdf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--