From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about raid5 disk recovery logic
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 18:00:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120701180053.504ba439@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRgLy7uJAzTwnuvgXgH=SnKdVBqgPF41eM0N-CYn8bS2BzW9A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1422 bytes --]
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:08:40 +0300 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I am trying to understand what happens when raid5 is recovering a
> disk, and a write comes to a stripe that has not been recovered yet.
> Does md first reconstruct the missing chunk and then applies the
> write, or first the write is applied as if the array is still degraded
> (and not recovering), and only later the missing chunk is
> reconstructed (when the md_do_sync() loop gets to this area)?
> I am looking at the stripe handling logic (kernel 2.6.38), can anybody
> pls point me at the path that handle_stripe5() takes in that case?
>
>
Hi Alex,
The stripe is still degraded, so md/raid5 treats it like a write to a
degraded array.
Exactly what happens depends one which block is being written.
If the block being written would be stored on the recovering devices, then
md will perform a reconstruct-write. It will read the other data blocks,
calculate the parity, and write out the parity and the changed data.
Similarly if the parity block is on the recovering device a
reconstruct-write will be needed.
If some other block is being written, md will do a read-modify-write to
calculate the new parity and then write out the parity and data. In this
case the block on the recovering device will not be written.
I hope that clarifies the situation.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-01 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-01 7:08 Question about raid5 disk recovery logic Alexander Lyakas
2012-07-01 8:00 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-07-01 13:36 ` Alexander Lyakas
2012-07-01 21:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-02 8:32 ` Alexander Lyakas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120701180053.504ba439@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).