From: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 16:52:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207031652444687381@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120703163810.531a000c@notabene.brown
On 2012-07-03 14:38 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:23:41 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
>> bio which be merged into to the same request.
>> Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
>> operation like re-write and re-read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
>
>Hi,
> I think this patch needs a more detailed explanation.
>
>What exactly is the situation that causes a problem, and what exactly is the
>problem that it causes?
>
>Pretend that I don't know anything about what happens below the md level..
>
>Thanks,
>NeilBrown
>
>
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++
>> drivers/md/raid5.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>> drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 3c923a7..ee04bfc 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -1401,6 +1401,9 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
>> if (bio->bi_rw & REQ_RAHEAD)
>> req->cmd_flags |= REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
>>
>> + if (unlikely(bio->bi_rw & REQ_NOMERGE))
>> + req->cmd_flags |= REQ_NOMERGE;
>> +
>> req->errors = 0;
>> req->__sector = bio->bi_sector;
>> req->ioprio = bio_prio(bio);
>> @@ -1428,6 +1431,11 @@ void blk_queue_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> goto get_rq;
>> }
>>
>> + if (unlikely(bio->bi_rw & REQ_NOMERGE)) {
>> + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>> + where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
>> + goto get_rq;
>> + }
>> /*
>> * Check if we can merge with the plugged list before grabbing
>> * any locks.
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> index d267672..04f78d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> @@ -632,6 +632,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
>> else
>> bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector
>> + rdev->data_offset);
>> + if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
>> + bi->bi_rw |= REQ_NOMERGE;
>> +
>> bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
>> bi->bi_idx = 0;
>> bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
>> @@ -1731,7 +1734,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
>> atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &rdev->corrected_errors);
>> clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> - }
>> + } else if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
>> + clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> +
>> if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors))
>> atomic_set(&rdev->read_errors, 0);
>> } else {
>> @@ -1773,7 +1778,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
>> else
>> retry = 1;
>> if (retry)
>> - set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> + if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
>> + set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> + clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> + } else
>> + set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> else {
>> clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
>> @@ -4481,7 +4490,8 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
>> conf->retry_read_aligned = raid_bio;
>> return handled;
>> }
>> -
>> + if (likely(raid_bio->bi_size >> 9) > STRIPE_SECTORS)
>> + set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);
>> handle_stripe(sh);
>> release_stripe(sh);
>> handled++;
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
>> index 2164021..6767d07 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
>> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags {
>> R5_Wantwrite,
>> R5_Overlap, /* There is a pending overlapping request
>> * on this block */
>> + R5_ReadNoMerge, /* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */
>> R5_ReadError, /* seen a read error here recently */
>> R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
>>
>
>
How about the below explanation:
Because bio will be merged at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
bio which be merged into to the same request.
For example: if chunk_aligned_read failed, it will add bio to some stipe.
But because the bio-merge function,those bios at most be merged.It will like
the chunk_aligned_read and returen error.Then it will re-write and re-read.
Suppose RAID5 created by n disk and chunk-size is 512K.
If read 512k chunk_aligned and met error(sector 0 is media error),
then add 512/4=128 stipe.If those bios merged and must be error.The rewrite operation
will read (n-1) * 128 and computer 128 stripe.But using this flag,we only exec one rewrite.
This occur in resync/repair situation and chunk-aligned-read.
May be using this flag,we can find exact bad-sector.Not recorded the whole request bios
as bad-sector.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-03 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 6:23 [RFC PATCH] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer majianpeng
2012-07-03 6:38 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-03 8:52 ` majianpeng [this message]
2012-07-04 2:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-04 5:29 ` majianpeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207031652444687381@gmail.com \
--to=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).