* [patch 3/3]raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization
@ 2012-07-03 7:51 Shaohua Li
2012-07-04 3:17 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shaohua Li @ 2012-07-03 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid; +Cc: neilb, axboe, dan.j.williams
Neil pointed out the bitmap write optimization in handle_stripe_clean_event()
is unnecessary, because the chance one stripe gets written twice in the mean
time is rare. We can always do a bitmap_startwrite when a write request is
added to a stripe and bitmap_endwrite after write request is done. Delete the
optimization. With it, we can delete some cases of stripe_lock.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-07-03 14:58:51.241382361 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-07-03 15:04:48.568889733 +0800
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_
spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
if (forwrite) {
bip = &sh->dev[dd_idx].towrite;
- if (*bip == NULL && sh->dev[dd_idx].written == NULL)
+ if (*bip == NULL)
firstwrite = 1;
} else
bip = &sh->dev[dd_idx].toread;
@@ -2427,7 +2427,6 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
int i;
for (i = disks; i--; ) {
struct bio *bi;
- int bitmap_end = 0;
if (test_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
struct md_rdev *rdev;
@@ -2451,10 +2450,9 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
/* fail all writes first */
bi = sh->dev[i].towrite;
sh->dev[i].towrite = NULL;
- if (bi) {
+ if (bi)
s->to_write--;
- bitmap_end = 1;
- }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Overlap, &sh->dev[i].flags))
wake_up(&conf->wait_for_overlap);
@@ -2473,7 +2471,6 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
/* and fail all 'written' */
bi = sh->dev[i].written;
sh->dev[i].written = NULL;
- if (bi) bitmap_end = 1;
while (bi && bi->bi_sector <
sh->dev[i].sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
struct bio *bi2 = r5_next_bio(bi, sh->dev[i].sector);
@@ -2509,10 +2506,8 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
bi = nextbi;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
- if (bitmap_end)
- bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
- STRIPE_SECTORS, 0, 0);
+ bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
+ STRIPE_SECTORS, 0, 0);
/* If we were in the middle of a write the parity block might
* still be locked - so just clear all R5_LOCKED flags
*/
@@ -2713,9 +2708,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(st
test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)) {
/* We can return any write requests */
struct bio *wbi, *wbi2;
- int bitmap_end = 0;
pr_debug("Return write for disc %d\n", i);
- spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
wbi = dev->written;
dev->written = NULL;
while (wbi && wbi->bi_sector <
@@ -2728,15 +2721,10 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(st
}
wbi = wbi2;
}
- if (dev->towrite == NULL)
- bitmap_end = 1;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
- if (bitmap_end)
- bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap,
- sh->sector,
- STRIPE_SECTORS,
+ bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
+ STRIPE_SECTORS,
!test_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state),
- 0);
+ 0);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 3/3]raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization
2012-07-03 7:51 [patch 3/3]raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization Shaohua Li
@ 2012-07-04 3:17 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-07-04 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shaohua Li; +Cc: linux-raid, axboe, dan.j.williams
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4505 bytes --]
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:51:11 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org> wrote:
> Neil pointed out the bitmap write optimization in handle_stripe_clean_event()
> is unnecessary, because the chance one stripe gets written twice in the mean
> time is rare. We can always do a bitmap_startwrite when a write request is
> added to a stripe and bitmap_endwrite after write request is done. Delete the
> optimization. With it, we can delete some cases of stripe_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/md/raid5.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-07-03 14:58:51.241382361 +0800
> +++ linux/drivers/md/raid5.c 2012-07-03 15:04:48.568889733 +0800
> @@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static int add_stripe_bio(struct stripe_
> spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> if (forwrite) {
> bip = &sh->dev[dd_idx].towrite;
> - if (*bip == NULL && sh->dev[dd_idx].written == NULL)
> + if (*bip == NULL)
> firstwrite = 1;
> } else
> bip = &sh->dev[dd_idx].toread;
> @@ -2427,7 +2427,6 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
> int i;
> for (i = disks; i--; ) {
> struct bio *bi;
> - int bitmap_end = 0;
>
> if (test_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
> struct md_rdev *rdev;
> @@ -2451,10 +2450,9 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
> /* fail all writes first */
> bi = sh->dev[i].towrite;
> sh->dev[i].towrite = NULL;
> - if (bi) {
> + if (bi)
> s->to_write--;
> - bitmap_end = 1;
> - }
> + spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
>
> if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Overlap, &sh->dev[i].flags))
> wake_up(&conf->wait_for_overlap);
> @@ -2473,7 +2471,6 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
> /* and fail all 'written' */
> bi = sh->dev[i].written;
> sh->dev[i].written = NULL;
> - if (bi) bitmap_end = 1;
> while (bi && bi->bi_sector <
> sh->dev[i].sector + STRIPE_SECTORS) {
> struct bio *bi2 = r5_next_bio(bi, sh->dev[i].sector);
> @@ -2509,10 +2506,8 @@ handle_failed_stripe(struct r5conf *conf
> bi = nextbi;
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> - if (bitmap_end)
> - bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
> - STRIPE_SECTORS, 0, 0);
> + bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
> + STRIPE_SECTORS, 0, 0);
> /* If we were in the middle of a write the parity block might
> * still be locked - so just clear all R5_LOCKED flags
> */
Thanks.
However this section - handle_failed_stripe - isn't correct.
bitmap_startwrite and bitmap_endwrite increment and decrement a
counter and so must be balanced.
We are now counting once for each list that is on either ->towrite or
->written. We bitmap_startwrite when we set ->towrite, we then move that to
->written. Then when we remove from ->written we bitmap_endwrite.
In the handle_failed_stripe case we may remove 0, 1, or 2 lists. So we
need to call bitmap_endwrite 0, 1, or 2 times.
So if towrite was not NULL, we want to call bitmap_endwrite
then if written was not NULL we want to call it again.
Also I think I'd prefer it if this patch were before "add a per-stripe lock".
It is best to first get rid of use of device_lock first, then change some of
the remaining ones to stripe_lock. Changing some to stripe_lock, then
discarding them seems messy.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> @@ -2713,9 +2708,7 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(st
> test_bit(R5_UPTODATE, &dev->flags)) {
> /* We can return any write requests */
> struct bio *wbi, *wbi2;
> - int bitmap_end = 0;
> pr_debug("Return write for disc %d\n", i);
> - spin_lock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> wbi = dev->written;
> dev->written = NULL;
> while (wbi && wbi->bi_sector <
> @@ -2728,15 +2721,10 @@ static void handle_stripe_clean_event(st
> }
> wbi = wbi2;
> }
> - if (dev->towrite == NULL)
> - bitmap_end = 1;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&sh->stripe_lock);
> - if (bitmap_end)
> - bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap,
> - sh->sector,
> - STRIPE_SECTORS,
> + bitmap_endwrite(conf->mddev->bitmap, sh->sector,
> + STRIPE_SECTORS,
> !test_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state),
> - 0);
> + 0);
> }
> }
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-04 3:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-03 7:51 [patch 3/3]raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization Shaohua Li
2012-07-04 3:17 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).