* [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
@ 2012-07-13 11:13 majianpeng
2012-07-16 5:48 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-07-13 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
operation like re-write and re-read.
V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
layer.
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 04348d7..059989f6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -640,6 +640,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
else
bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector
+ rdev->data_offset);
+ if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
+ bi->bi_rw |= REQ_FLUSH;
+
bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
bi->bi_idx = 0;
bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
@@ -1739,7 +1742,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &rdev->corrected_errors);
clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
- }
+ } else if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
+ clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+
if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors))
atomic_set(&rdev->read_errors, 0);
} else {
@@ -1784,7 +1789,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
else
retry = 1;
if (retry)
- set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+ if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
+ set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+ clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
+ } else
+ set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
else {
clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
@@ -4504,6 +4513,7 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
return handled;
}
+ set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);
handle_stripe(sh);
release_stripe(sh);
handled++;
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index 2164021..6767d07 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags {
R5_Wantwrite,
R5_Overlap, /* There is a pending overlapping request
* on this block */
+ R5_ReadNoMerge, /* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */
R5_ReadError, /* seen a read error here recently */
R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
2012-07-13 11:13 [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer majianpeng
@ 2012-07-16 5:48 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-16 6:57 ` majianpeng
2012-07-21 4:35 ` majianpeng
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-07-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: majianpeng; +Cc: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3037 bytes --]
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:35 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
> bio which be merged into to the same request.
> Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
> operation like re-write and re-read.
>
> V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
> layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 04348d7..059989f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,9 @@ static void ops_run_io(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
> else
> bi->bi_sector = (sh->sector
> + rdev->data_offset);
> + if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
> + bi->bi_rw |= REQ_FLUSH;
> +
> bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
> bi->bi_idx = 0;
> bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
> @@ -1739,7 +1742,9 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
> atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &rdev->corrected_errors);
> clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> - }
> + } else if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags))
> + clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> +
> if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors))
> atomic_set(&rdev->read_errors, 0);
> } else {
> @@ -1784,7 +1789,11 @@ static void raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, int error)
> else
> retry = 1;
> if (retry)
> - set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> + if (test_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
> + set_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> + clear_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> + } else
> + set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> else {
> clear_bit(R5_ReadError, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> clear_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
> @@ -4504,6 +4513,7 @@ static int retry_aligned_read(struct r5conf *conf, struct bio *raid_bio)
> return handled;
> }
>
> + set_bit(R5_ReadNoMerge, &sh->dev[dd_idx].flags);
> handle_stripe(sh);
> release_stripe(sh);
> handled++;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> index 2164021..6767d07 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ enum r5dev_flags {
> R5_Wantwrite,
> R5_Overlap, /* There is a pending overlapping request
> * on this block */
> + R5_ReadNoMerge, /* prevent bio from merging in block-layer */
> R5_ReadError, /* seen a read error here recently */
> R5_ReWrite, /* have tried to over-write the readerror */
>
Thanks, I've applied this.
We should probably do a similar thing in fix_read_error and
fix_sync_read_error in RAID1 and RAID10...
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
2012-07-16 5:48 ` NeilBrown
@ 2012-07-16 6:57 ` majianpeng
2012-07-21 4:35 ` majianpeng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-07-16 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid
On 2012-07-16 13:48 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:35 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
>> bio which be merged into to the same request.
>> Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
>> operation like re-write and re-read.
>>
>> V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
>> layer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/raid5.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
[snip]
>
>Thanks, I've applied this.
>
>We should probably do a similar thing in fix_read_error and
>fix_sync_read_error in RAID1 and RAID10...
>
Thanks, I'll do it.
>Thanks,
>NeilBrown
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
2012-07-16 5:48 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-16 6:57 ` majianpeng
@ 2012-07-21 4:35 ` majianpeng
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-07-21 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-raid
On 2012-07-16 13:48 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Wrote:
>On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:13:35 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
>> bio which be merged into to the same request.
>> Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
>> operation like re-write and re-read.
>>
>> V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
>> layer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
[snip]
>
>
>Thanks, I've applied this.
>
>We should probably do a similar thing in fix_read_error and
>fix_sync_read_error in RAID1 and RAID10...
>
I reviewed the code about fix_read_error/fix_sync_read_error.
It already do the similar thing.
>Thanks,
>NeilBrown
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-21 4:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-13 11:13 [RFC PATCH V1] raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer majianpeng
2012-07-16 5:48 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-16 6:57 ` majianpeng
2012-07-21 4:35 ` majianpeng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).