From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: neilb@suse.de
Subject: [RFC 2/2]raid1: use discard if sync data is 0
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:02:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726080255.GB21457@kernel.org> (raw)
In raid sync, if disks data isn't match and data of source disk is 0, we can
further optimize write for SSD - discard other disks. This will involve extra
memory compare, but discard can improve garbage collection of SSD. This is
disabled by default too.
Block layer doesn't provide async version API to do discard, so currently we do
synchronization discard.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
---
drivers/md/raid1.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/md/raid1.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/md/raid1.c 2012-07-26 10:39:20.250706326 +0800
+++ linux/drivers/md/raid1.c 2012-07-26 14:59:05.186777126 +0800
@@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@ static int fix_sync_read_error(struct r1
return 1;
}
-static int process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio)
+static int process_checks(struct r1bio *r1_bio, int *do_discard)
{
/* We have read all readable devices. If we haven't
* got the block, then there is no hope left.
@@ -1744,7 +1744,9 @@ static int process_checks(struct r1bio *
int primary;
int i;
int vcnt;
+ int check_do_discard = 0;
+ *do_discard = 0;
for (primary = 0; primary < conf->raid_disks * 2; primary++)
if (r1_bio->bios[primary]->bi_end_io == end_sync_read &&
test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &r1_bio->bios[primary]->bi_flags)) {
@@ -1761,6 +1763,7 @@ static int process_checks(struct r1bio *
struct bio *pbio = r1_bio->bios[primary];
struct bio *sbio = r1_bio->bios[i];
int size;
+ struct request_queue *queue;
if (sbio->bi_end_io != end_sync_read &&
!(sbio->bi_end_io == end_sync_write &&
@@ -1788,6 +1791,22 @@ static int process_checks(struct r1bio *
rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[i].rdev, mddev);
continue;
}
+ queue = bdev_get_queue(conf->mirrors[i].rdev->bdev);
+ if (j >= 0 && !check_do_discard && blk_queue_discard(queue) &&
+ queue_discard_zeroes_data(queue) &&
+ test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_MODE_DISCARD, &mddev->recovery_mode)) {
+ for (j = vcnt; j-- ; ) {
+ struct page *p;
+ p = pbio->bi_io_vec[j].bv_page;
+ if (memcmp(page_address(p),
+ page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)),
+ pbio->bi_io_vec[j].bv_len))
+ break;
+ }
+ if (j < 0)
+ *do_discard = 1;
+ check_do_discard = 1;
+ }
/* fixup the bio for reuse */
sbio->bi_vcnt = vcnt;
sbio->bi_size = r1_bio->sectors << 9;
@@ -1800,6 +1819,8 @@ static int process_checks(struct r1bio *
conf->mirrors[i].rdev->data_offset;
sbio->bi_bdev = conf->mirrors[i].rdev->bdev;
+ if (*do_discard)
+ continue;
size = sbio->bi_size;
for (j = 0; j < vcnt ; j++) {
struct bio_vec *bi;
@@ -1824,6 +1845,7 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct md
int i;
int disks = conf->raid_disks * 2;
struct bio *bio, *wbio;
+ int do_discard = 0;
bio = r1_bio->bios[r1_bio->read_disk];
@@ -1834,7 +1856,7 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct md
if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery) ||
test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_MODE_REPAIR, &mddev->recovery_mode))
- if (process_checks(r1_bio) < 0)
+ if (process_checks(r1_bio, &do_discard) < 0)
return;
/*
* schedule writes
@@ -1848,6 +1870,13 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct md
!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery))))
continue;
+ if (do_discard) {
+ md_sync_acct(wbio->bi_bdev, wbio->bi_size >> 9);
+ /* This is a silly synchronization IO */
+ blkdev_issue_discard(wbio->bi_bdev, wbio->bi_sector,
+ r1_bio->sectors, GFP_NOIO, 0);
+ continue;
+ }
wbio->bi_rw = WRITE;
wbio->bi_end_io = end_sync_write;
atomic_inc(&r1_bio->remaining);
reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120726080255.GB21457@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).