From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:04:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120813020454.GA447@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120813115051.64d5d44e@notabene.brown>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:50:51AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:51:19 +0800 Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> wrote:
>
> > @@ -4094,6 +4159,19 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *m
> > bi->bi_next = NULL;
> > bi->bi_phys_segments = 1; /* over-loaded to count active stripes */
> >
> > + /* block layer doesn't correctly do alignment even we set correct alignment */
> > + if (unlikely(bi->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)) {
> > + int stripe_sectors = conf->chunk_sectors *
> > + (conf->raid_disks - conf->max_degraded);
>
> This isn't right when an array is being reshaped.
> I suspect that during a reshape we should only attempt DISCARD on the part of
> the array which has already been reshaped. On the other section we can
> either fail the discard (is that a good idea?) or write zeros.
I had a check in below for-loop for reshape, is it enough? If not, I'd like
just ignore discard request for reshape. We force discard_zero_data to be 0, so
should be ok.
I'll fix other two issues. Will repost the raid5 discard patches later.
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-13 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-10 2:51 [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 1/7 v2] block: makes bio_split support bio without data Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 2/7 v2] md: linear supports TRIM Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 3/7 v2] md: raid 0 " Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 4/7 v2] md: raid 1 " Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 5/7 v2] md: raid 10 " Shaohua Li
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 6/7 v2] MD: raid5 trim support Shaohua Li
2012-08-13 1:50 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-13 2:04 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-08-13 3:58 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-13 5:43 ` Shaohua Li
2012-09-11 4:10 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-12 4:09 ` Shaohua Li
2012-09-18 4:52 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-10 2:51 ` [patch 7/7 v2] MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim Shaohua Li
2012-08-13 1:51 ` [patch 0/7 v2] MD linear/0/1/10/5 TRIM support NeilBrown
2012-08-29 18:58 ` Holger Kiehl
2012-08-29 20:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-08-30 0:45 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120813020454.GA447@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).