From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: Hello,Re: GPT Table broken on a Raid1 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:43:04 +1000 Message-ID: <20120927124304.2db38a82@notabene.brown> References: <4961154.0TR9MeFlIq@techz> <5231765.ZMIFzBOKSc@techz> <5315095.pvR2SvTGWe@techz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/5OjI4VEYCasIIjCjjg8LadS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Murphy Cc: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/5OjI4VEYCasIIjCjjg8LadS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:33:49 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: >=20 > On Sep 26, 2012, at 6:17 AM, G=FCnther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > >>=20 > >> dirty state. > >=20 > > OK, I run the Intel Tool in windows two times with the last Tool I foun= d. > >=20 > > The Tool don't found any Problem (?) and don't repair, but mdadm=85. >=20 > I'm going to trim this down: >=20 > >=20 > > /dev/sda: > > [Volume0]: > > UUID : ec120401:b6ed52e6:3814fac4:48fcf4fc > > Map State : normal > > Dirty State : clean > >=20 > >=20 > > /dev/sdb: > > [Volume0]: > > UUID : ec120401:b6ed52e6:3814fac4:48fcf4fc > > Map State : normal > > Dirty State : dirty > > =B0=B0=B0=B0=B0=B0=B0 >=20 > I don't understand this UI. Are there two Volume0's?=20 >=20 > I can see how the dirty state would apply independently among physical de= vices /dev/sda and /dev/sdb. But the virtual device, the array volume, "Vol= ume0" seems like it would have only one instance. So I don't understand how= it can be clean in one case and dirty in another. >=20 It just means that when looking at the metadata on /dev/sda, we see it mark= ed 'clean', and when looking at the metadata on /dev/sdb, we see that it is marked 'dirty'. Possibly something wrote to Volume0 between these two events, so the volume got marked 'dirty' so the write could happen. Wait a few seconds and it should get marked 'clean' again. Or possibly there is a bug somewhere. I would open two windows. In one run watch -d mdadm -E /dev/sda and in the other run watch -d mdadm -E /dev/sdb then access the array, or maybe leave it alone, and see how the metadata changes with time. NeilBrown --Sig_/5OjI4VEYCasIIjCjjg8LadS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUGO9ODnsnt1WYoG5AQJiAA/9H2DW+PtLUtVr8ZDGg6YgfKSUlib8/myo VcMNf7YTR+N3r/lxUc9nKjOVaSAIJUBfRBngz8Wy8GP/gzL8L8S12tmglO6KcZa8 RK98uWmKhvcTrxC8luzvHWBGssjunQuRwQreFlzTubyi6WrepOLU4Lhje3fmpwQs 2ck5enmCa6+fm1p3UVd6AqRIotT+mtG20xKczcdaU/F1O76YBr/ibv+e/pLNo5U2 KrShlepGbNf32OhgJHNT3JzQTk+87ZzxxrM5uomve+fNNAQFx3TZBGLGeY4O5d9M zU82fOMhw93ClwVhE5yK/599GE/HLdKqhEmOwVGTl/Syr9qmgn/vDl2v4zyOy2Wu eNotK0JZHi+ht9PkJihgtYRK/xhbfIl5njLkZJ5vGqAjG1P7Q8yxjsE5Jw7ovtFU 8uy2zvDdHnEVRZIXmXpmdb2JuPhQrEHmc2MGU4jES6bujIDGJi8yl/Dg+bcheOLg 7ZSF7lAu+TfZ9PcBQC6soXk3rGA7dyUV6f/AJ0QxEQ4T3lBUZi3RuIGMXH3rsXeR h0LP/snxKXDTWjJ5GNCydi5WF9qiwjL+/puBmvTUI1gJ969S5OVWDsTjN8AhHk2c mQ7cCKpr0UyN61TcyC8vnFuV44m8p89/loVZLCQImTg5zARi50sNj3hZfnDfexxQ Km6hGd+gLIk= =Fe6Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5OjI4VEYCasIIjCjjg8LadS--