linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with DISCARD and RAID5
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:40:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102014058.GA20526@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101173854.62061307@notabene.brown>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:38:54PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 
> Hi Shaohua,
>  I've been doing some testing and discovered a problem with your discard
>  support for RAID5.
> 
>  The code in blkdev_issue_discard assumes that the 'granularity' is a power
>  of 2, and for example subtracts 1 to get a mask.
> 
>  However RAID5 sets the granularity to be the stripe size which often is not
>  a power of two.  When this happens you can easily get into an infinite loop.
> 
>  I suspect that to make this work properly, blkdev_issue_discard will need to
>  be changed to allow 'granularity' to be an arbitrary value.
>  When it is a power of two, the current masking can be used.
>  When it is anything else, it will need to use sector_div().

Yep, looks we need use sector_div. And this isn't the only problem. discard
request can be merged, and the merge check only checks max_discard_sectors.
That means the split requests in blkdev_issue_discard can be merged again. The
split nerver works.

I'm wondering what's purpose of discard_alignment and discard_granularity. Are
there devices with discard_granularity not 1 sector? If bio isn't discard
aligned, what device will do? Further, why driver handles alignment/granularity
if device will ignore misaligned request. Jens, can you share some hints please?

Thanks,
Shaohua

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-01  6:38 Problem with DISCARD and RAID5 NeilBrown
2012-11-02  1:40 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-11-05 21:48   ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06  8:06     ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-07  5:02       ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121102014058.GA20526@kernel.org \
    --to=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).