From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with DISCARD and RAID5
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:40:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102014058.GA20526@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101173854.62061307@notabene.brown>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:38:54PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Hi Shaohua,
> I've been doing some testing and discovered a problem with your discard
> support for RAID5.
>
> The code in blkdev_issue_discard assumes that the 'granularity' is a power
> of 2, and for example subtracts 1 to get a mask.
>
> However RAID5 sets the granularity to be the stripe size which often is not
> a power of two. When this happens you can easily get into an infinite loop.
>
> I suspect that to make this work properly, blkdev_issue_discard will need to
> be changed to allow 'granularity' to be an arbitrary value.
> When it is a power of two, the current masking can be used.
> When it is anything else, it will need to use sector_div().
Yep, looks we need use sector_div. And this isn't the only problem. discard
request can be merged, and the merge check only checks max_discard_sectors.
That means the split requests in blkdev_issue_discard can be merged again. The
split nerver works.
I'm wondering what's purpose of discard_alignment and discard_granularity. Are
there devices with discard_granularity not 1 sector? If bio isn't discard
aligned, what device will do? Further, why driver handles alignment/granularity
if device will ignore misaligned request. Jens, can you share some hints please?
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-01 6:38 Problem with DISCARD and RAID5 NeilBrown
2012-11-02 1:40 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2012-11-05 21:48 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06 8:06 ` Jens Axboe
2012-11-07 5:02 ` Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121102014058.GA20526@kernel.org \
--to=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).