Where can i download mdadm 3.3

Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
?

Thanks !

[]'s
Salatiel

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 614 bytes --]

On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
> ?
>
You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.

However
  git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
  cd mdadm
  make

will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.

Alternately you can get a tar file at

   http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

Thanks Neil !
[]'s
Salatiel


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
>> ?
>>
> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
>
> However
>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
>   cd mdadm
>   make
>
> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
>
> Alternately you can get a tar file at
>
>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
>
> NeilBrown

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

[]'s
Salatiel


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
<salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Neil !
> []'s
> Salatiel
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
>>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
>>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
>>> ?
>>>
>> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
>>
>> However
>>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
>>   cd mdadm
>>   make
>>
>> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
>>
>> Alternately you can get a tar file at
>>
>>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
>>
>> NeilBrown

Forgot to send a copy to the list:


Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
# mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?

I actually created also a new array
# mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1727 bytes --]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> []'s
> Salatiel
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
> <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Neil !
> > []'s
> > Salatiel
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
> >>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
> >>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
> >>> ?
> >>>
> >> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
> >>
> >> However
> >>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
> >>   cd mdadm
> >>   make
> >>
> >> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
> >>
> >> Alternately you can get a tar file at
> >>
> >>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
> >>
> >> NeilBrown
> 
> Forgot to send a copy to the list:
> 
> 
> Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
> # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?

Yes, I think that is right - does it work?

> 
> I actually created also a new array
> # mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
> but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?

mdadm -E /dev/sdb3

should show

   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset xxx sectors

NeilBrown

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:25 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > []'s
> > Salatiel
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
> > <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks Neil !
> > > []'s
> > > Salatiel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
> > >>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
> > >>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
> > >>> ?
> > >>>
> > >> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
> > >>
> > >> However
> > >>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
> > >>   cd mdadm
> > >>   make
> > >>
> > >> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
> > >>
> > >> Alternately you can get a tar file at
> > >>
> > >>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
> > >>
> > >> NeilBrown
> >
> > Forgot to send a copy to the list:
> >
> >
> > Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
> > # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?
>
> Yes, I think that is right - does it work?
>
> >
> > I actually created also a new array
> > # mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
> > but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?
>
> mdadm -E /dev/sdb3
>
> should show
>
>    Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset xxx sectors
>
> NeilBrown
>
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>


Well, about the tests:
I have put some data on a degraded raid 5 with 3 disks where one of
them has random read errors. After that i added a new disk and the
raid started to resync.
After 62.5% i started getting read errors on /dev/sdd2 and the array
stopped to resync.

1) Shouldn`t badblocks be ignored to allow the recover of most data?
I can see in mdadm -E /dev/sdd2   Bad Block Log : 512 entries
available at offset 262128 sectors - bad blocks present.

2) After stop the array and try to reassembled with   mdadm -A
/dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force i got the following message:
mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force
mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdb2(0) from 87705 upto 87713
mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdc2(1) from 87705 upto 87713
mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).

and i noticed that sde2 was not added to the array.

# mdadm -D /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
        Version : 1.2
  Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 1306106880 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
   Raid Devices : 4
  Total Devices : 3
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

  Intent Bitmap : Internal

    Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
          State : active, degraded
 Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 512K

           Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
           UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
         Events : 87713

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0       8       18        0      active sync   /dev/sdb2
       1       8       34        1      active sync   /dev/sdc2
       2       8       50        2      active sync   /dev/sdd2
       6       0        0        6      removed


After add it manually , mdadm -a /dev/md1 /dev/sde2
the rebuild started from the beginning, ignoring the recovery offset:

# mdadm -E /dev/sde2
/dev/sde2:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 1.2
    Feature Map : 0xb
     Array UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
           Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
  Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
     Raid Level : raid5
   Raid Devices : 4

 Avail Dev Size : 3592190757 (1712.89 GiB 1839.20 GB)
     Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 2612213760 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
    Data Offset : 262144 sectors
   Super Offset : 8 sectors
Recovery Offset : 1634547480 sectors
          State : clean
    Device UUID : 08019409:984c2217:21706201:039b6bbf

Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
    Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
  Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 262128 sectors
       Checksum : bd6c4947 - correct
         Events : 87705

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 512K

   Device Role : Active device 3
   Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)



3) What's the correct procedure that allows me recover most of the
data, ignoring the readerrors ?

4) I know that sdd2 has read errors at  sectors 1634863440 -
1634863800, if i write zero directly to those sectors using 'dd' , how
will raid behave during rebuild? After a write it will probably be
able to read it again (i dont care about the data on those sectors) .

5) Right now i am not using replaceable option , but where replaceable
option could help me here ?


Thanks !

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6366 bytes --]

On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:30:10 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:25 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > []'s
> > > Salatiel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
> > > <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thanks Neil !
> > > > []'s
> > > > Salatiel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > > >> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
> > > >>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
> > > >>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
> > > >>> ?
> > > >>>
> > > >> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
> > > >>
> > > >> However
> > > >>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
> > > >>   cd mdadm
> > > >>   make
> > > >>
> > > >> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
> > > >>
> > > >> Alternately you can get a tar file at
> > > >>
> > > >>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
> > > >>
> > > >> NeilBrown
> > >
> > > Forgot to send a copy to the list:
> > >
> > >
> > > Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
> > > # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?
> >
> > Yes, I think that is right - does it work?
> >
> > >
> > > I actually created also a new array
> > > # mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
> > > but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?
> >
> > mdadm -E /dev/sdb3
> >
> > should show
> >
> >    Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset xxx sectors
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> 
> Well, about the tests:
> I have put some data on a degraded raid 5 with 3 disks where one of
> them has random read errors. After that i added a new disk and the
> raid started to resync.
> After 62.5% i started getting read errors on /dev/sdd2 and the array
> stopped to resync.

Any useful messages from the kernel log?

> 
> 1) Shouldn`t badblocks be ignored to allow the recover of most data?
> I can see in mdadm -E /dev/sdd2   Bad Block Log : 512 entries
> available at offset 262128 sectors - bad blocks present.

That's the theory.  And bad blocks found should be recorded on both sdd2 and
the new device.

> 
> 2) After stop the array and try to reassembled with   mdadm -A
> /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force i got the following message:
> mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force
> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdb2(0) from 87705 upto 87713
> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdc2(1) from 87705 upto 87713
> mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).

That doesn't look good.  Again, complete kernel messages might help.

> 
> and i noticed that sde2 was not added to the array.
> 
> # mdadm -D /dev/md1
> /dev/md1:
>         Version : 1.2
>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
>      Raid Level : raid5
>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 1306106880 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 4
>   Total Devices : 3
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> 
>   Intent Bitmap : Internal
> 
>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
>           State : active, degraded
>  Active Devices : 3
> Working Devices : 3
>  Failed Devices : 0
>   Spare Devices : 0
> 
>          Layout : left-symmetric
>      Chunk Size : 512K
> 
>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
>            UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
>          Events : 87713
> 
>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>        0       8       18        0      active sync   /dev/sdb2
>        1       8       34        1      active sync   /dev/sdc2
>        2       8       50        2      active sync   /dev/sdd2
>        6       0        0        6      removed
> 
> 
> After add it manually , mdadm -a /dev/md1 /dev/sde2
> the rebuild started from the beginning, ignoring the recovery offset:

That would be because the 'Events' number is too old so the 'recovery offset'
is suspect.


> 
> # mdadm -E /dev/sde2
> /dev/sde2:
>           Magic : a92b4efc
>         Version : 1.2
>     Feature Map : 0xb
>      Array UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
>      Raid Level : raid5
>    Raid Devices : 4
> 
>  Avail Dev Size : 3592190757 (1712.89 GiB 1839.20 GB)
>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 2612213760 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
>     Data Offset : 262144 sectors
>    Super Offset : 8 sectors
> Recovery Offset : 1634547480 sectors
>           State : clean
>     Device UUID : 08019409:984c2217:21706201:039b6bbf
> 
> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
>   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 262128 sectors
>        Checksum : bd6c4947 - correct
>          Events : 87705
> 
>          Layout : left-symmetric
>      Chunk Size : 512K
> 
>    Device Role : Active device 3
>    Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)
> 
> 
> 
> 3) What's the correct procedure that allows me recover most of the
> data, ignoring the readerrors ?
> 
> 4) I know that sdd2 has read errors at  sectors 1634863440 -
> 1634863800, if i write zero directly to those sectors using 'dd' , how
> will raid behave during rebuild? After a write it will probably be
> able to read it again (i dont care about the data on those sectors) .

If it can read, it will, and will write to the new device.

> 
> 5) Right now i am not using replaceable option , but where replaceable
> option could help me here ?

I don't think 'replaceable' is particularly relevant here.

NeilBrown


> 
> 
> Thanks !


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:30:10 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:25 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > []'s
>> > > Salatiel
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
>> > > <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > Thanks Neil !
>> > > > []'s
>> > > > Salatiel
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>> > > >> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
>> > > >>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
>> > > >>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
>> > > >>> ?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> However
>> > > >>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
>> > > >>   cd mdadm
>> > > >>   make
>> > > >>
>> > > >> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Alternately you can get a tar file at
>> > > >>
>> > > >>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
>> > > >>
>> > > >> NeilBrown
>> > >
>> > > Forgot to send a copy to the list:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
>> > > # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?
>> >
>> > Yes, I think that is right - does it work?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > I actually created also a new array
>> > > # mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
>> > > but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?
>> >
>> > mdadm -E /dev/sdb3
>> >
>> > should show
>> >
>> >    Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset xxx sectors
>> >
>> > NeilBrown
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >
>>
>>
>> Well, about the tests:
>> I have put some data on a degraded raid 5 with 3 disks where one of
>> them has random read errors. After that i added a new disk and the
>> raid started to resync.
>> After 62.5% i started getting read errors on /dev/sdd2 and the array
>> stopped to resync.
>
> Any useful messages from the kernel log?
>
>>
>> 1) Shouldn`t badblocks be ignored to allow the recover of most data?
>> I can see in mdadm -E /dev/sdd2   Bad Block Log : 512 entries
>> available at offset 262128 sectors - bad blocks present.
>
> That's the theory.  And bad blocks found should be recorded on both sdd2 and
> the new device.
>
>>
>> 2) After stop the array and try to reassembled with   mdadm -A
>> /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force i got the following message:
>> mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force
>> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdb2(0) from 87705 upto 87713
>> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdc2(1) from 87705 upto 87713
>> mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).
>
> That doesn't look good.  Again, complete kernel messages might help.
>
>>
>> and i noticed that sde2 was not added to the array.
>>
>> # mdadm -D /dev/md1
>> /dev/md1:
>>         Version : 1.2
>>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
>>      Raid Level : raid5
>>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
>>   Used Dev Size : 1306106880 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
>>    Raid Devices : 4
>>   Total Devices : 3
>>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>>   Intent Bitmap : Internal
>>
>>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
>>           State : active, degraded
>>  Active Devices : 3
>> Working Devices : 3
>>  Failed Devices : 0
>>   Spare Devices : 0
>>
>>          Layout : left-symmetric
>>      Chunk Size : 512K
>>
>>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
>>            UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
>>          Events : 87713
>>
>>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>>        0       8       18        0      active sync   /dev/sdb2
>>        1       8       34        1      active sync   /dev/sdc2
>>        2       8       50        2      active sync   /dev/sdd2
>>        6       0        0        6      removed
>>
>>
>> After add it manually , mdadm -a /dev/md1 /dev/sde2
>> the rebuild started from the beginning, ignoring the recovery offset:
>
> That would be because the 'Events' number is too old so the 'recovery offset'
> is suspect.
>
>
>>
>> # mdadm -E /dev/sde2
>> /dev/sde2:
>>           Magic : a92b4efc
>>         Version : 1.2
>>     Feature Map : 0xb
>>      Array UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
>>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
>>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
>>      Raid Level : raid5
>>    Raid Devices : 4
>>
>>  Avail Dev Size : 3592190757 (1712.89 GiB 1839.20 GB)
>>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
>>   Used Dev Size : 2612213760 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
>>     Data Offset : 262144 sectors
>>    Super Offset : 8 sectors
>> Recovery Offset : 1634547480 sectors
>>           State : clean
>>     Device UUID : 08019409:984c2217:21706201:039b6bbf
>>
>> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
>>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
>>   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 262128 sectors
>>        Checksum : bd6c4947 - correct
>>          Events : 87705
>>
>>          Layout : left-symmetric
>>      Chunk Size : 512K
>>
>>    Device Role : Active device 3
>>    Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)
>>
>>
>>
>> 3) What's the correct procedure that allows me recover most of the
>> data, ignoring the readerrors ?
>>
>> 4) I know that sdd2 has read errors at  sectors 1634863440 -
>> 1634863800, if i write zero directly to those sectors using 'dd' , how
>> will raid behave during rebuild? After a write it will probably be
>> able to read it again (i dont care about the data on those sectors) .
>
> If it can read, it will, and will write to the new device.
>
>>
>> 5) Right now i am not using replaceable option , but where replaceable
>> option could help me here ?
>
> I don't think 'replaceable' is particularly relevant here.
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks !
>

I am still doing some tests and i will report back.
btw, is there anyway to see how many badblock the disk has ? I can see
only the 'bad blocks present.' , but not how many.

[]'s
Salatiel

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[NeilBrown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7536 bytes --]

On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:59:53 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:30:10 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:25 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:00:35 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > []'s
> >> > > Salatiel
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Salatiel Filho
> >> > > <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Thanks Neil !
> >> > > > []'s
> >> > > > Salatiel
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> >> > > >> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
> >> > > >>> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
> >> > > >>> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
> >> > > >>> ?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >> You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> However
> >> > > >>   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
> >> > > >>   cd mdadm
> >> > > >>   make
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Alternately you can get a tar file at
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> NeilBrown
> >> > >
> >> > > Forgot to send a copy to the list:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
> >> > > # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, I think that is right - does it work?
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > I actually created also a new array
> >> > > # mdadm -C -n4 -l5 -e 1.2 /dev/md2 /dev/sd[bcde]3 ,
> >> > > but how do i verify if badblock support was enabled ?
> >> >
> >> > mdadm -E /dev/sdb3
> >> >
> >> > should show
> >> >
> >> >    Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset xxx sectors
> >> >
> >> > NeilBrown
> >> >
> >> > > --
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Well, about the tests:
> >> I have put some data on a degraded raid 5 with 3 disks where one of
> >> them has random read errors. After that i added a new disk and the
> >> raid started to resync.
> >> After 62.5% i started getting read errors on /dev/sdd2 and the array
> >> stopped to resync.
> >
> > Any useful messages from the kernel log?
> >
> >>
> >> 1) Shouldn`t badblocks be ignored to allow the recover of most data?
> >> I can see in mdadm -E /dev/sdd2   Bad Block Log : 512 entries
> >> available at offset 262128 sectors - bad blocks present.
> >
> > That's the theory.  And bad blocks found should be recorded on both sdd2 and
> > the new device.
> >
> >>
> >> 2) After stop the array and try to reassembled with   mdadm -A
> >> /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force i got the following message:
> >> mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcde]2 --force
> >> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdb2(0) from 87705 upto 87713
> >> mdadm: forcing event count in /dev/sdc2(1) from 87705 upto 87713
> >> mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).
> >
> > That doesn't look good.  Again, complete kernel messages might help.
> >
> >>
> >> and i noticed that sde2 was not added to the array.
> >>
> >> # mdadm -D /dev/md1
> >> /dev/md1:
> >>         Version : 1.2
> >>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
> >>      Raid Level : raid5
> >>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
> >>   Used Dev Size : 1306106880 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
> >>    Raid Devices : 4
> >>   Total Devices : 3
> >>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> >>
> >>   Intent Bitmap : Internal
> >>
> >>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
> >>           State : active, degraded
> >>  Active Devices : 3
> >> Working Devices : 3
> >>  Failed Devices : 0
> >>   Spare Devices : 0
> >>
> >>          Layout : left-symmetric
> >>      Chunk Size : 512K
> >>
> >>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
> >>            UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
> >>          Events : 87713
> >>
> >>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
> >>        0       8       18        0      active sync   /dev/sdb2
> >>        1       8       34        1      active sync   /dev/sdc2
> >>        2       8       50        2      active sync   /dev/sdd2
> >>        6       0        0        6      removed
> >>
> >>
> >> After add it manually , mdadm -a /dev/md1 /dev/sde2
> >> the rebuild started from the beginning, ignoring the recovery offset:
> >
> > That would be because the 'Events' number is too old so the 'recovery offset'
> > is suspect.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> # mdadm -E /dev/sde2
> >> /dev/sde2:
> >>           Magic : a92b4efc
> >>         Version : 1.2
> >>     Feature Map : 0xb
> >>      Array UUID : 93e55a39:94681b9d:4c0a1a15:cad51a71
> >>            Name : zotac:1  (local to host zotac)
> >>   Creation Time : Tue Nov 20 08:43:35 2012
> >>      Raid Level : raid5
> >>    Raid Devices : 4
> >>
> >>  Avail Dev Size : 3592190757 (1712.89 GiB 1839.20 GB)
> >>      Array Size : 3918320640 (3736.80 GiB 4012.36 GB)
> >>   Used Dev Size : 2612213760 (1245.60 GiB 1337.45 GB)
> >>     Data Offset : 262144 sectors
> >>    Super Offset : 8 sectors
> >> Recovery Offset : 1634547480 sectors
> >>           State : clean
> >>     Device UUID : 08019409:984c2217:21706201:039b6bbf
> >>
> >> Internal Bitmap : 8 sectors from superblock
> >>     Update Time : Sun Nov 25 10:04:06 2012
> >>   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available at offset 262128 sectors
> >>        Checksum : bd6c4947 - correct
> >>          Events : 87705
> >>
> >>          Layout : left-symmetric
> >>      Chunk Size : 512K
> >>
> >>    Device Role : Active device 3
> >>    Array State : AAAA ('A' == active, '.' == missing, 'R' == replacing)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 3) What's the correct procedure that allows me recover most of the
> >> data, ignoring the readerrors ?
> >>
> >> 4) I know that sdd2 has read errors at  sectors 1634863440 -
> >> 1634863800, if i write zero directly to those sectors using 'dd' , how
> >> will raid behave during rebuild? After a write it will probably be
> >> able to read it again (i dont care about the data on those sectors) .
> >
> > If it can read, it will, and will write to the new device.
> >
> >>
> >> 5) Right now i am not using replaceable option , but where replaceable
> >> option could help me here ?
> >
> > I don't think 'replaceable' is particularly relevant here.
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >
> 
> I am still doing some tests and i will report back.
> btw, is there anyway to see how many badblock the disk has ? I can see
> only the 'bad blocks present.' , but not how many.

When the array is active you can look in /sys/block/mdXX/md/dev-YYY/badblocks
It will list them all.
Currently mdadm doesn't extract this information.  I should probably add an
   --examine-badblocks
option to list them.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

Re: Where can i download mdadm 3.3

[Salatiel Filho]

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:15 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:33:10 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:42:22 -0300 Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi guys, i will be building a few arrays very soon and i'd like to
>> >> test the badblock feature and the replaceable feature, but i haven`t
>> >> found where i can download the source of mdadm 1.3. Where can i get it
>> >> ?
>> >>
>> > You can't.  3.3 doesn't exist yet.
>> >
>> > However
>> >   git clone git://neil.brown.name/mdadm
>> >   cd mdadm
>> >   make
>> >
>> > will get you code that supports bad blocks and replaceable devices.
>> >
>> > Alternately you can get a tar file at
>> >
>> >    http://git.neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm.git;a=snapshot;h=master
>> >
>> > NeilBrown
>>
>> Neil , now the question, how do i enable badblock list ?
>> # mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sd[bcd]2 --update=bbl  ?
>
> Why not posted to the list?
>
> That looks right.  Did it work?
>
> NeilBrown


I forgot "reply to all" , sorry.

Yes, it worked. I was looking for some information with
# mdadm -D /dev/md1 and could not find.
but
#mdadm -E /dev/sdb2 shows me   Bad Block Log : 512 entries available
at offset 262128 sectors , so i think it is activated. Now i'm writing
to the array so my bad disk will show me some error.

I will report the progress as soon as the errors appear.
Thanks !


[]'s
Salatiel