From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Hill Subject: Re: failed raid re-create changed dev size Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:49:49 +0000 Message-ID: <20121211144949.GB28593@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> References: <1355216495.50c6f66f123b1@mail.inbox.lv> <20121211092710.GA28593@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> <1355236515.50c744a3720c1@mail.inbox.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1355236515.50c744a3720c1@mail.inbox.lv> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andris Berzins Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Andris Berzins wrote: > Quoting "Robin Hill" : > >=20 > > You will likely have lost some data though, as the new superblocks will > > have overwritten part of the data, so make sure you run a fsck > > afterwards (start with fsck -n though, to make sure the overall array > > looks okay first). >=20 > Is it possible that no data was damaged? It is LUKS partition, i > mapped it and run "fsck -n" on underlying ext3 partition,=20 > but fsck returned immediately with status "clean". >=20 By default fsck will just check whether the filesystem is marked as dirty/clean and just skip running if it's clean. You'll need to use "-f" to force it to run. Cheers, Robin --=20 ___ =20 ( ' } | Robin Hill | / / ) | Little Jim says .... | // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" | --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlDHSAwACgkQShxCyD40xBJPLwCg0aRooksZaOiZoiULgGY77qKE NkoAn2R3zVkHJgTI95kr4+guRw3c36yk =EdZB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v9Ux+11Zm5mwPlX6--