linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Recovering from an URE on a RAID5 rebuild/resize
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:14:59 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125171459.5f855c92@natsu> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1296 bytes --]

Hello,

Recently there has been some talk on this list, about probability of seeing an
URE during a RAID5 rebuild on modern large (e.g. 2TB) drives.

I would like to ask for some advice of what would be the best way to proceed
when such an URE is encountered. This is mostly theoretical, no real situation
at hand at the moment.

As I understand, a RAID5 that is being resized or rebuilt, has no redundancy;
it is essentially as reliable as a RAID0 of total members-1, or even less.

So on an unreadable sector that mdadm needs to read (because it has no
redundancy to recover it from), mdadm will:

  - mark the corresponding array member as "failed";
  - mark the one that was being rebuilt/resized onto as "spare";
  - and the whole array as down and "not enough members to start the array".

Let's assume only a couple of sectors on that member were unreadable, and then
their readability was restored (either by drive replacement or by overwriting
them to making the drive remap), and I would be okay with losing data that was
in those sectors.

What would be the best way to proceed from there?


-- 
With respect,
Roman

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Stallman had a printer,
with code he could not see.
So he began to tinker,
and set the software free."

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25 11:14 Roman Mamedov [this message]
2013-01-25 18:34 ` Recovering from an URE on a RAID5 rebuild/resize Stan Hoeppner
2013-01-25 20:28 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-25 20:43   ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-25 20:50     ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-26 23:40 ` Phil Turmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130125171459.5f855c92@natsu \
    --to=rm@romanrm.ru \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).