From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid456: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:11:02 +1100 Message-ID: <20130305081102.73211ef9@notabene.brown> References: <20130223074001.GA5199@www.outflux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/+sQlSWdjxSVU6gD8Nvdt+vk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kees Cook Cc: Dan Williams , LKML , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Dan Williams , Alasdair G Kergon , Greg Kroah-Hartman List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/+sQlSWdjxSVU6gD8Nvdt+vk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:59:30 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Kees Cook wro= te: > >> The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > >> while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > >> Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > >> Cc: Arjan van de Ven > >> Cc: Dan Williams > >> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon > >> --- > >> drivers/md/Kconfig | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> index 7cdf359..0cc3a3d 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig > >> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ config MULTICORE_RAID456 > >> bool "RAID-4/RAID-5/RAID-6 Multicore processing (EXPERIMENTAL)" > >> depends on MD_RAID456 > >> depends on SMP > >> - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > > > In this case MULTICORE_RAID456 and the related code should go as > > well... now that there are patches to supersede this implementation in > > md-next. >=20 > Can my original patch go through as-is for Linus's tree? Right now, > this is the last use of EXPERIMENTAL in v3.9-rc1. If we can drop it, > we can remove the config item entirely from v3.9. My pull request which removes CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456 completely was a lit= tle late and missed -rc1. Hopefully it will appear soon. But if it isn't gone by -rc2, I have no objection to your patch going in th= en. NeilBrown --Sig_/+sQlSWdjxSVU6gD8Nvdt+vk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUTUN5jnsnt1WYoG5AQJKcg//UpFsNV3bHA2HOwaT+dKw2NB3qk6yFfOM fE/vcqlsb7Vx8IkJ76TIFRmYfnd+tiHObUBk9Elwqox1UWd/D2DkAUO8mqcq1TgB lbJk8WXH904ixFB8+M/XQGDCGaP4K+S1J+jXwanzkfVxOhOBYEaTbfZjrcWOGZTg FVpQVJLs3o7DXux1kk2SEO3zziw8w+38LOrobz0jRMJY4l72EzxV0GvE5hG9y1Jn 2LZkGJMq30Cx2aZ2b8E8A9BqM5rLvQehS1HFNLdHYVjWu2DNHLk0/9ffCNc799+l vCPke8jcdPPorSN8IqAfNKvKn/79wOx476l3lIMF7CCy/RHLA2A9cgQZsCJffcEN CYoCs61aYXdDtdjFDA9X2cZKabSmaq3IIVI8MNs6z8VQe1Q+s8kgbMR6WlqA85Rx a943q21J+DY8JUdIrRc6a6k+BJfcINvtRxPr2MbKFRp0Hgw0ope43N5U9+t4hZ4V 4XXHLiO9P8qtUmat74nIQeARyGY5FF2odInZnkmMgfkzaQFvITO5I/LiDa9a1Bpm 5gpekEGhBnN5asdKxHhKUx2sqbXMxT4BQlXIoqb+ygpzOqwI8KujbjkonjEOc7GS hY8E3QHtO2NqYHtuzlBzEY6NSkEcApesgUQblkgHsGBoVYPHgV0xV8XRPragm+Rj +0QSwqSm+Vs= =FmSN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+sQlSWdjxSVU6gD8Nvdt+vk--