From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MD: Do not increment resync_mismatches unless MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:36:26 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422103626.4cdcefae@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366402161.18514.1.camel@f16>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3850 bytes --]
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:09:21 -0500 Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
wrote:
> MD: Do not increment resync_mismatches unless MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED
>
> resync_mismatches is used to display the number of differences that
> have been found or repaired during a scrubbing operation. It is not
> meant to count anything during resync or repair operations. (How
> much sense does it make to find resync_mismatches populated after an
> initial synchronization of the array? After cleaning-up an unclean
> shutdown? After [re]integrating a device into an existing array?)
> The incrementing of the variable must be restricted to when the user
> initiates a scrubbing operation (i.e. "check" or "repair").
How do you know what it is "meant" to do? :-)
While it might not be particularly useful, I see no point in hiding
information, and no desire to change what mismatch_cnt reports.
It may well be useful to somehow report what the real meaning for
mismatch_cnt is. i.e. to report what the last sync_action was.
Then any use-space tool that reported mismatch_cnt, could adjust according to
whether the last operation was check/repair or resync/recovery/reshape. etc.
So if you were to provide a patch which adds "last_sync_action" or similar,
I'd certainly consider that.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
>
> Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -1878,7 +1878,8 @@ static int process_checks(struct r1bio *
> }
> } else
> j = 0;
> - if (j >= 0)
> + if ((j >= 0) &&
> + (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery)))
> atomic64_add(r1_bio->sectors, &mddev->resync_mismatches);
> if (j < 0 || (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery)
> && test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &sbio->bi_flags))) {
> Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid10.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -2071,7 +2071,10 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct md
> break;
> if (j == vcnt)
> continue;
> - atomic64_add(r10_bio->sectors, &mddev->resync_mismatches);
> +
> + if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery))
> + atomic64_add(r10_bio->sectors,
> + &mddev->resync_mismatches);
> if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &mddev->recovery))
> /* Don't fix anything. */
> continue;
> Index: linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid5.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-upstream.orig/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ linux-upstream/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -2989,7 +2989,10 @@ static void handle_parity_checks5(struct
> */
> set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
> else {
> - atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
> + if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED,
> + &conf->mddev->recovery))
> + atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS,
> + &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
> if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
> /* don't try to repair!! */
> set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
> @@ -3141,7 +3144,10 @@ static void handle_parity_checks6(struct
> */
> }
> } else {
> - atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
> + if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED,
> + &conf->mddev->recovery))
> + atomic64_add(STRIPE_SECTORS,
> + &conf->mddev->resync_mismatches);
> if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_CHECK, &conf->mddev->recovery))
> /* don't try to repair!! */
> set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 20:09 [PATCH] MD: Do not increment resync_mismatches unless MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED Jonathan Brassow
2013-04-22 0:36 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-04-22 16:26 ` Brassow Jonathan
2013-04-22 17:22 ` Doug Ledford
2013-04-22 23:44 ` NeilBrown
2013-04-22 23:59 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130422103626.4cdcefae@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=jbrassow@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox