From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Keith Keller <kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: vess raid stripes disappear
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 07:27:32 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130510072732.5a9cea9d@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ss5axrjb.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1427 bytes --]
On Thu, 09 May 2013 08:32:20 -0700 Keith Keller
<kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2013-05-09, Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru> wrote:
> >
> > I (also) was under impression that linux-raid is not just for md, but for a=
> > ll
> > kinds of RAID in GNU/Linux. It's just that historically it's mostly about m=
> > d.
>
> Indeed, the majordomo info says only this:
>
> "Welcome to the linux-raid mailing list, hosted on vger.kernel.org.
> Discussions on this list should be relevant to using RAID technologies
> with Linux. The list has a wiki howto at http://raid.wiki.kernel.org/"
>
> This is somewhat contradictory with the wiki overview:
>
> "This site is the Linux-raid kernel list community-managed reference for
> Linux software RAID as implemented in recent 2.6 kernels."
I don't see a contradiction.
The mailing list is for anything about RAID on Linux. The community formed
around the list are generally interested in various sorts of RAID on Linux.
Software RAID is a popular subtopic and for that subtopic there is a
supporting wiki. It doesn't claim to be a complete reference for linux-raid,
only for the software RAID subtopic of linux-raid.
But the 2.6 should go.
>
> So I admit to being a bit confused! Is there a consensus among the
> admins what the list topics should be?
There aren't any admins. There are only subscribers and posters.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-09 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 11:29 vess raid stripes disappear mashtin.bakir
2013-05-09 14:59 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 15:10 ` Roman Mamedov
2013-05-09 15:32 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 15:41 ` Adam Goryachev
2013-05-09 16:23 ` David Brown
2013-05-09 21:33 ` Keith Keller
2013-05-09 21:27 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-05-10 7:55 ` SOLVED " Stan Hoeppner
2013-05-10 12:44 ` mashtin.bakir
2013-05-10 14:17 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130510072732.5a9cea9d@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=kkeller@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).