From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAD1 doesn't fail WRITE that was written only on a rebuilding drive
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:52:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130604095235.16261243@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRgLy6tHN7ZPwxxRM4pzVbKP5fS0PLeXrhKoeZ0XJqVrb0pVQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1747 bytes --]
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:46:33 +0300 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Neil,
> we continue testing last-drive RAID1 failure cases.
> We see the following issue:
>
> # RAID1 with drives A and B; drive B was freshly-added and is rebuilding
> # Drive A fails
> # WRITE request arrives to the array. It is failed by drive A, so
> r1_bio is marked as R1BIO_WriteError, but the rebuilding drive B
> succeeds in writing it, so the same r1_bio is marked as
> R1BIO_Uptodate.
> # r1_bio arrives to handle_write_finished, badblocks are disabled,
> md_error()->error() does nothing because we don't fail the last drive
> of raid1
> # raid_end_bio_io() calls call_bio_endio()
> # As a result, in call_bio_endio():
> if (!test_bit(R1BIO_Uptodate, &r1_bio->state))
> clear_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags);
> this code doesn't clear the BIO_UPTODATE flag, and the whole master
> WRITE succeeds, back to the upper layer.
>
> # This keeps happening until rebuild aborts, and drive B is ejected
> from the array[1]. After that, there is only one drive (A), so after
> it fails a WRITE, the master WRITE also fails.
>
> It should be noted, that I test a WRITE that is way ahead of
> recovery_offset of drive B. So after such WRITE fails, subsequent READ
> to the same place would fail, because drive A will fail it, and drive
> B cannot be attempted to READ from there (rebuild has not reached
> there yet).
>
> My concrete suggestion is that this behavior is not reasonable, and we
> should only count a successful WRITE to a drive that is marked as
> InSync. Please let me know what do you think?
Sounds reasonable. Could you make and test a patch? Then I'll apply it.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-28 12:46 RAD1 doesn't fail WRITE that was written only on a rebuilding drive Alexander Lyakas
2013-05-28 20:12 ` Alexander Lyakas
2013-06-04 0:04 ` NeilBrown
2013-06-03 23:52 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-06-04 17:54 ` Alexander Lyakas
2013-06-12 0:26 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130604095235.16261243@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).