From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piergiorgio Sartor Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] raid6check fixes Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20130620161639.GA3033@lazy.lzy> References: <20130618090910.1161109.69430.stgit@fsdevel7.hpc.devnet.itwm.fhg.de> <20130619100803.03fde6d5@notabene.brown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130619100803.03fde6d5@notabene.brown> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: Bernd Schubert , piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:08:03AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:09:10 +0200 Bernd Schubert > wrote: >=20 > > Here are a few raid6check fixes. This series also includes a patch = for > > Makefile to allow to build with optimizations. I only fixed raid6ch= eck > > to build with -O3, but I don't have time left today to fix mdadm=20 > > (e.g. Grow.c:2237:41: error: =E2=80=98info2.data_offset=E2=80=99 ma= y be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=3Duninitialized]) > >=20 >=20 > Thanks for mentioning that. I've fix that problem. >=20 > NeilBrown >=20 >=20 > > I wanted to send the memleak-fixes much earlier, but then > > I had been too busy. This patch is lightly tested, patches > > from today are only build-tested. >=20 Hi Neil, BTW, what's your plan of including "raid6check" into a main release of "mdadm" package? Do you have "deadline" in mind? Thanks, bye, --=20 piergiorgio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html