linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>
To: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:40:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130706074001.GA2387@lazy.lzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373070976.5395.26.camel@fermat.scientia.net>

On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:36:16AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
[...]
> Well but it's not a bad point either, is it?
> And when we remember back at the issues (IIRC) Seagate had with the
> firmwares of some of it's devices, that suddenly stopped working at some
> special date... than it could easily happen you're screwed with having
> all disks from one vendor i.e. with the same type.
> 
> I vaguely remember that back then there were even cases where firmware
> updates didn't help anymore... but I may be wrong on that.

Hi Chris,

we have some workstation with RAID5, 4 HDDs, from
4 different vendors (at that time there were 4).

We notice smart errors at a different rate, time and
type, but almost always in the same way for each brand.

In other words, yes, it helped to have different brands.

The only thing, you must confirm the size.
Ours are all identical, but I can imagine there could
be minor differences, expecially from 512B to 4096B.

bye,

-- 

piergiorgio

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-06  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-04 18:17 question about the best suited RAID level/layout Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-04 21:43 ` Phil Turmel
2013-07-04 22:58   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-05  1:07     ` Brad Campbell
2013-07-06  0:36       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-06  5:29         ` Brad Campbell
2013-07-06 14:49           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-07  6:36             ` Brad Campbell
2013-07-06  7:40         ` Piergiorgio Sartor [this message]
2013-07-06 14:52           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-05  1:12     ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-06  0:46       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-06  8:36         ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-06 15:04           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-06 15:41             ` Matt Garman
2013-07-07 14:08             ` David Brown
2013-07-07 16:45             ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-07 17:26               ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-09 15:50                 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-07-05 13:36     ` Phil Turmel
2013-07-06  1:11       ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-06  2:19         ` Phil Turmel
2013-07-06 17:55           ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-07 12:46             ` Bernd Schubert
2013-07-07 17:39               ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-05 11:10 ` David Brown
2013-07-06  0:55   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130706074001.GA2387@lazy.lzy \
    --to=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
    --cc=calestyo@scientia.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).