linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: mwilck@arcor.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:48:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708154810.561ba2a2@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372883287-8859-6-git-send-email-mwilck@arcor.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2841 bytes --]

On Wed,  3 Jul 2013 22:27:45 +0200 mwilck@arcor.de wrote:

> This patch implements the previously unsupported case where
> store_super_ddf is called with a non-empty superblock.
> 
> For DDF, writing meta data to just one disk makes no sense.
> We would run the risk of writing inconsistent meta data
> to the devices. So just call __write_init_super_ddf and
> write to all devices, including the one passed by the caller.
> 
> This patch assumes that the device to store the superblock on
> has already been added to the DDF structure. Otherwise, an
> error message will be emitted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>

I'm not sure I really like this.  If mdadm is calling ->store_super, then it
wants to write to just one device.  It will quite possibly call
->store_super on all devices, and with your change that will write to all
devices multiple times.
So maybe a different interface is needed?

What is the big-picture effect of this patch?  What mdadm function now works
that didn't work before?

Thanks,
NeilBrown



> ---
>  super-ddf.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
> index b806949..b3c846d 100644
> --- a/super-ddf.c
> +++ b/super-ddf.c
> @@ -3471,15 +3471,44 @@ static int store_super_ddf(struct supertype *st, int fd)
>  	if (!ddf)
>  		return 1;
>  
> -	/* ->dlist and ->conflist will be set for updates, currently not
> -	 * supported
> -	 */
> -	if (ddf->dlist || ddf->conflist)
> -		return 1;
> -
>  	if (!get_dev_size(fd, NULL, &dsize))
>  		return 1;
>  
> +	if (ddf->dlist || ddf->conflist) {
> +		struct stat sta;
> +		struct dl *dl;
> +		int ofd, ret;
> +
> +		if (fstat(fd, &sta) == -1 || !S_ISBLK(sta.st_mode)) {
> +			pr_err("%s: file descriptor for invalid device\n",
> +			       __func__);
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +		for (dl = ddf->dlist; dl; dl = dl->next)
> +			if (dl->major == (int)major(sta.st_rdev) &&
> +			    dl->minor == (int)minor(sta.st_rdev))
> +				break;
> +		if (!dl) {
> +			pr_err("%s: couldn't find disk %d/%d\n", __func__,
> +			       (int)major(sta.st_rdev),
> +			       (int)minor(sta.st_rdev));
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +		/*
> +		   For DDF, writing to just one disk makes no sense.
> +		   We would run the risk of writing inconsistent meta data
> +		   to the devices. So just call __write_init_super_ddf and
> +		   write to all devices, including this one.
> +		   Use the fd passed to this function, just in case dl->fd
> +		   is invalid.
> +		 */
> +		ofd = dl->fd;
> +		dl->fd = fd;
> +		ret =  __write_init_super_ddf(st);
> +		dl->fd = ofd;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (posix_memalign(&buf, 512, 512) != 0)
>  		return 1;
>  	memset(buf, 0, 512);


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-08  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 20:27 DDF/RAID10 patch series mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 01/27] DDF (cleanup): use a common macro for failed searches mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 02/27] DDF: check_secondary: fix treatment of missing BVDs mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 03/27] DDF: load_ddf_headers: use secondary header as fallback mwilck
2013-07-08  5:43   ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 20:56     ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 04/27] DDF: handle "open flag" according to spec mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf mwilck
2013-07-08  5:48   ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-07-10 17:37     ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-15  5:31       ` NeilBrown
2013-07-18 18:48         ` [PATCH 1/3] DDF: increase seq number in ddf_set_updates_pending mwilck
2013-07-18 18:49         ` [PATCH 2/3] DDF: make "null_aligned" a static buffer mwilck
2013-07-18 18:49         ` [PATCH 3/3] DDF: factor out writing super block to single disk mwilck
2013-07-18 18:51         ` [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 06/27] DDF: ddf_open_new: implement minimal consistency check mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-08  6:16   ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 21:03     ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 08/27] DDF: ddf_set_disk: move status logic to separate function mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 09/27] DDF: get_svd_state: Status logic for secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 10/27] DDF: allow empty slots in virt disk table mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 11/27] DDF: layout_ddf2md: new DDF->md RAID layout conversion mwilck
2013-07-08  6:48   ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 21:06     ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 12/27] DDF: layout_md2ddf: new md->DDF " mwilck
2013-07-08  6:28   ` NeilBrown
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 13/27] DDF: Simplify allocation of "other BVDs" mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 14/27] DDF: init_super_ddf_bvd: initialize other bvds mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 15/27] DDF: validate_geometry_ddf: support RAID10 mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 16/27] DDF: use LBA_OFFSET macro instead of lba_offset field mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 17/27] DDF: get_extents: support secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 18/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: allow empty slots in phys disk table mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 19/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: Use same amount of workspace as other disks mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 20/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: RAID10 changes mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 21/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf_bvd: use get_svd_state() mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 22/27] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: lba_offset calculation for RAID10 mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 23/27] DDF: guid_str: convenience function to print GUID for debugging mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 24/27] DDF: ddf_set_array_state: more meaningful output mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 25/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: handle update of conf records for SVD mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 26/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix vlist treatment for SVDs mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 27/27] tests/10ddf-create: add RAID 10 array mwilck
2013-07-04 10:10 ` DDF/RAID10 patch series NeilBrown
2013-07-08  6:53 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 21:50 ` Fixes for the DDF " mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 28/39] test/10-ddf-create: fix comments mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 29/39] Monitor: Don't write metadata in inactive array state mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 30/39] DDF: write_init_super_ddf: don't zero superblocks for subarrays mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 31/39] DDF: implement kill_subarray mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 32/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: identify disk by refnum mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 33/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: fix raid_disk calculation mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 34/39] DDF: fix endianness of refnum in debug messages mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 35/39] DDF: add debug message in add_super_ddf_bvd mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 36/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: add debug messages fore adding VDs mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 37/39] DDF: guid_str: more readable output mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 38/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: some more debug messages mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 39/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix updates for SVDs mwilck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130708154810.561ba2a2@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mwilck@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).