From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: mwilck@arcor.de
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:16:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130708161652.11d1c47f@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372883287-8859-8-git-send-email-mwilck@arcor.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5901 bytes --]
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 22:27:47 +0200 mwilck@arcor.de wrote:
> If secondary RAID level is taken into account, translation between
> the md RAID member (raid_disk) and the index of a physical disk
> in a BVD becomes more complex.
>
> Also, take into account that the member list can have unused entries
> (this is independent of secondary RAID level).
>
> Adapt usage of find_vdcr() accordingly
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
> ---
> super-ddf.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
> index ae24bb9..c448bff 100644
> --- a/super-ddf.c
> +++ b/super-ddf.c
> @@ -1441,13 +1441,76 @@ static int match_home_ddf(struct supertype *st, char *homehost)
> }
>
> #ifndef MDASSEMBLE
> -static struct vd_config *find_vdcr(struct ddf_super *ddf, unsigned int inst)
> +static int find_index_in_bvd(const struct ddf_super *ddf,
> + const struct vd_config *conf, unsigned int n,
> + unsigned int *n_bvd)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Find the index of the n-th valid physical disk in this BVD
> + */
> + unsigned int i, j;
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < ddf->mppe &&
> + j < __be16_to_cpu(conf->prim_elmnt_count); i++) {
> + if (conf->phys_refnum[i] != 0xffffffff) {
Should that 0xffffffff be DDF_NOTFOUND?
(I glazed over reading the rest of this patch .. sorry. Maybe I'll try again
another day)
NeilBrown
> + if (n == j) {
> + *n_bvd = i;
> + return 1;
> + }
> + j++;
> + }
> + }
> + dprintf("%s: couldn't find BVD member %u (total %u)\n",
> + __func__, n, __be16_to_cpu(conf->prim_elmnt_count));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vd_config *find_vdcr(struct ddf_super *ddf, unsigned int inst,
> + unsigned int n,
> + unsigned int *n_bvd, struct vcl **vcl)
> {
> struct vcl *v;
>
> - for (v = ddf->conflist; v; v = v->next)
> - if (inst == v->vcnum)
> - return &v->conf;
> + for (v = ddf->conflist; v; v = v->next) {
> + unsigned int nsec, ibvd;
> + struct vd_config *conf;
> + if (inst != v->vcnum)
> + continue;
> + conf = &v->conf;
> + if (conf->sec_elmnt_count == 1) {
> + if (find_index_in_bvd(ddf, conf, n, n_bvd)) {
> + *vcl = v;
> + return conf;
> + } else
> + goto bad;
> + }
> + if (v->other_bvds == NULL) {
> + pr_err("%s: BUG: other_bvds is NULL, nsec=%u\n",
> + __func__, conf->sec_elmnt_count);
> + goto bad;
> + }
> + nsec = n / __be16_to_cpu(conf->prim_elmnt_count);
> + if (conf->sec_elmnt_seq != nsec) {
> + for (ibvd = 1; ibvd < conf->sec_elmnt_count; ibvd++) {
> + if (v->other_bvds[ibvd-1] == NULL)
> + continue;
> + if (v->other_bvds[ibvd-1]->sec_elmnt_seq
> + == nsec)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (ibvd == conf->sec_elmnt_count)
> + goto bad;
> + conf = v->other_bvds[ibvd-1];
> + }
> + if (!find_index_in_bvd(ddf, conf,
> + n - nsec*conf->sec_elmnt_count, n_bvd))
> + goto bad;
> + dprintf("%s: found disk %u as member %u in bvd %d of array %u\n"
> + , __func__, n, *n_bvd, ibvd-1, inst);
> + *vcl = v;
> + return conf;
> + }
> +bad:
> + pr_err("%s: Could't find disk %d in array %u\n", __func__, n, inst);
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif
> @@ -3769,9 +3832,11 @@ static int ddf_set_array_state(struct active_array *a, int consistent)
> static void ddf_set_disk(struct active_array *a, int n, int state)
> {
> struct ddf_super *ddf = a->container->sb;
> - unsigned int inst = a->info.container_member;
> - struct vd_config *vc = find_vdcr(ddf, inst);
> - int pd = find_phys(ddf, vc->phys_refnum[n]);
> + unsigned int inst = a->info.container_member, n_bvd;
> + struct vcl *vcl;
> + struct vd_config *vc = find_vdcr(ddf, inst, (unsigned int)n,
> + &n_bvd, &vcl);
> + int pd;
> int i, st, working;
> struct mdinfo *mdi;
> struct dl *dl;
> @@ -3796,15 +3861,21 @@ static void ddf_set_disk(struct active_array *a, int n, int state)
> if (!dl)
> return;
>
> + pd = find_phys(ddf, vc->phys_refnum[n_bvd]);
> if (pd < 0 || pd != dl->pdnum) {
> /* disk doesn't currently exist or has changed.
> * If it is now in_sync, insert it. */
> + dprintf("%s: phys disk not found for %d: %d/%d ref %08x\n",
> + __func__, dl->pdnum, dl->major, dl->minor,
> + dl->disk.refnum);
> + dprintf("%s: array %u disk %u ref %08x pd %d\n",
> + __func__, inst, n_bvd, vc->phys_refnum[n_bvd], pd);
> if ((state & DS_INSYNC) && ! (state & DS_FAULTY)) {
> - struct vcl *vcl;
> - pd = dl->pdnum;
> - vc->phys_refnum[n] = dl->disk.refnum;
> - vcl = container_of(vc, struct vcl, conf);
> - vcl->lba_offset[n] = mdi->data_offset;
> + __u64 *lba_offset;
> + pd = dl->pdnum; /* FIXME: is this really correct ? */
> + vc->phys_refnum[n_bvd] = dl->disk.refnum;
> + lba_offset = (__u64 *)&vc->phys_refnum[ddf->mppe];
> + lba_offset[n_bvd] = mdi->data_offset;
> ddf->phys->entries[pd].type &=
> ~__cpu_to_be16(DDF_Global_Spare);
> ddf->phys->entries[pd].type |=
> @@ -4187,8 +4258,10 @@ static struct mdinfo *ddf_activate_spare(struct active_array *a,
> struct metadata_update *mu;
> struct dl *dl;
> int i;
> + struct vcl *vcl;
> struct vd_config *vc;
> __u64 *lba;
> + unsigned int n_bvd;
>
> for (d = a->info.devs ; d ; d = d->next) {
> if ((d->curr_state & DS_FAULTY) &&
> @@ -4353,7 +4426,8 @@ static struct mdinfo *ddf_activate_spare(struct active_array *a,
> mu->space = NULL;
> mu->space_list = NULL;
> mu->next = *updates;
> - vc = find_vdcr(ddf, a->info.container_member);
> + vc = find_vdcr(ddf, a->info.container_member, di->disk.raid_disk,
> + &n_bvd, &vcl);
> memcpy(mu->buf, vc, ddf->conf_rec_len * 512);
>
> vc = (struct vd_config*)mu->buf;
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-08 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-03 20:27 DDF/RAID10 patch series mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 01/27] DDF (cleanup): use a common macro for failed searches mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 02/27] DDF: check_secondary: fix treatment of missing BVDs mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 03/27] DDF: load_ddf_headers: use secondary header as fallback mwilck
2013-07-08 5:43 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 20:56 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 04/27] DDF: handle "open flag" according to spec mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf mwilck
2013-07-08 5:48 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-10 17:37 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-15 5:31 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-18 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] DDF: increase seq number in ddf_set_updates_pending mwilck
2013-07-18 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] DDF: make "null_aligned" a static buffer mwilck
2013-07-18 18:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] DDF: factor out writing super block to single disk mwilck
2013-07-18 18:51 ` [PATCH 05/27] DDF: Implement store_super_ddf Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 06/27] DDF: ddf_open_new: implement minimal consistency check mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 07/27] DDF: find_vdcr: account for secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-08 6:16 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-07-08 21:03 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 08/27] DDF: ddf_set_disk: move status logic to separate function mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 09/27] DDF: get_svd_state: Status logic for secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 10/27] DDF: allow empty slots in virt disk table mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 11/27] DDF: layout_ddf2md: new DDF->md RAID layout conversion mwilck
2013-07-08 6:48 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 21:06 ` Martin Wilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 12/27] DDF: layout_md2ddf: new md->DDF " mwilck
2013-07-08 6:28 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 13/27] DDF: Simplify allocation of "other BVDs" mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 14/27] DDF: init_super_ddf_bvd: initialize other bvds mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 15/27] DDF: validate_geometry_ddf: support RAID10 mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 16/27] DDF: use LBA_OFFSET macro instead of lba_offset field mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 17/27] DDF: get_extents: support secondary RAID level mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 18/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: allow empty slots in phys disk table mwilck
2013-07-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 19/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: Use same amount of workspace as other disks mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 20/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: RAID10 changes mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 21/27] DDF: add_to_super_ddf_bvd: use get_svd_state() mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 22/27] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: lba_offset calculation for RAID10 mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 23/27] DDF: guid_str: convenience function to print GUID for debugging mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 24/27] DDF: ddf_set_array_state: more meaningful output mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 25/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: handle update of conf records for SVD mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 26/27] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix vlist treatment for SVDs mwilck
2013-07-03 20:28 ` [PATCH 27/27] tests/10ddf-create: add RAID 10 array mwilck
2013-07-04 10:10 ` DDF/RAID10 patch series NeilBrown
2013-07-08 6:53 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-08 21:50 ` Fixes for the DDF " mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 28/39] test/10-ddf-create: fix comments mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 29/39] Monitor: Don't write metadata in inactive array state mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 30/39] DDF: write_init_super_ddf: don't zero superblocks for subarrays mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 31/39] DDF: implement kill_subarray mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 32/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: identify disk by refnum mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 33/39] DDF: getinfo_super_ddf_bvd: fix raid_disk calculation mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 34/39] DDF: fix endianness of refnum in debug messages mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 35/39] DDF: add debug message in add_super_ddf_bvd mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 36/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: add debug messages fore adding VDs mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 37/39] DDF: guid_str: more readable output mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 38/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: some more debug messages mwilck
2013-07-08 21:50 ` [PATCH 39/39] DDF: ddf_process_update: Fix updates for SVDs mwilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130708161652.11d1c47f@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).