linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
Subject: Re: MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:52:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130717145230.5088c52c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130716144920.39f428b7@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2142 bytes --]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:49:20 -0400 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
wrote:

> Hi Neil, Martin,
> 
> While testing patches to fix RAID1 repair GPF crash w/3.10-rc7
> ( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/43351 ), I encountered disk
> corruption when repeatedly failing, removing, and adding MD RAID1
> component disks to their array.  The RAID1 was created with an internal
> write bitmap and the test was run against alternating disks in the
> set.  I bisected this behavior back to commit 7ceb17e8 "md: Allow
> devices to be re-added to a read-only array", specifically these lines
> of code:
> 
> remove_and_add_spares:
> 
> +		if (rdev->saved_raid_disk >= 0 && mddev->in_sync) {
> +			spin_lock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
> +			if (mddev->in_sync)
> +				/* OK, this device, which is in_sync,
> +				 * will definitely be noticed before
> +				 * the next write, so recovery isn't
> +				 * needed.
> +				 */
> +				rdev->recovery_offset = mddev->recovery_cp;
> +			spin_unlock_irq(&mddev->write_lock);
> +		}
> +		if (mddev->ro && rdev->recovery_offset != MaxSector)
> +			/* not safe to add this disk now */
> +			continue;
> 
> when I #ifdef 0 these lines out, leaving rdev->recovery_offset = 0,
> then my tests run without incident.
> 
> If there is any instrumentation I can apply to remove_and_add_spares
> I'll be happy to gather more data.  I'll send an attached copy of
> my test programs in a reply so this mail doesn't get bounced by
> any spam filters.
> 
>

Thanks for the report Joe.

That code has problems.

If the array has a bitmap, then 'saved_raid_disk >= 0' means that the device
is fairly close, but the bitmap based resync is required first.  This code
skips that.

If the array does not have a bitmap, then 'saved_raid_disk >= 0' means that
this device was exactly right for this slot before, but there is no locking
to prevent updates going to the array between then super_1_validate checked
the event count, and when remove_and_add_spares tried to add it.

I suspect I should  just rip that code out and go back to the drawing board.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-16 18:49 MD RAID 1 fail/remove/add corruption in 3.10 Joe Lawrence
2013-07-16 19:05 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-07-17  2:52 ` Brad Campbell
2013-07-17  4:53   ` NeilBrown
2013-07-17  4:52 ` NeilBrown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130717145230.5088c52c@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mwilck@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).