linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	yair@zadarastorage.com, Shyam Kaushik <shyam@zadarastorage.com>,
	vladimir@zadarastorage.com
Subject: Re: md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:25:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729152522.63c35e5c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRgLy7GoknqbUSYFk82FnuNVBkvznqZZF7+FK1L3kPq7_C6wQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5791 bytes --]

On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:59:29 +0300 Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Neil,
> we have a 3-drive raid5, that was resyncing, but then one drive
> failed. As a result, now raid5 is livelocked on 100% cpu, and the
> failed drive is not ejected from the array.
> Kernel is ubuntu-precise 3.2.0-25 40 plus following patches applied manually:
> 
> commit fab363b5ff502d1b39ddcfec04271f5858d9f26e
> Author: Shaohua Li <shli <at> kernel.org>
> Date:   Tue Jul 3 15:57:19 2012 +1000
>     raid5: delayed stripe fix
> 
> and
> 
> commit a7854487cd7128a30a7f4f5259de9f67d5efb95f
> Author: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu Oct 11 13:50:12 2012 +1100
>     md: When RAID5 is dirty, force reconstruct-write instead of
> read-modify-write.
> 
> /proc/mdstat shows:
> 
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md2 : active raid5 dm-5[0] dm-7[2](F) dm-6[1]
>       7809200128 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2] [UU_]
>         resync=PENDING
>       bitmap: 29/30 pages [116KB], 65536KB chunk
> 
> >From the patches applied to that kernel above our version, the
> following seems somewhat relevant:
> 
> cc1ceee md/raid5: In ops_run_io, inc nr_pending before calling
> md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
> 
> but in our case badblocks are disabled.
> (original conversation is in http://www.spinics.net/lists/raid/msg39191.html).
> 
> Here are some stacks that we captured and appropriate places in the code:
> 
> [] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [] handle_stripe+0x400/0x1d80 [raid456]
> [] raid5d+0x463/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 0x59e0 is in handle_stripe
> (/mnt/work/alex/Ubuntu-3.2.0-25.40/drivers/md/raid5.c:495).
> 490             struct r5conf *conf = sh->raid_conf;
> 491             int i, disks = sh->disks;
> 492
> 493             might_sleep();
> 494
> 495             for (i = disks; i--; ) {
> 496                     int rw;
> 497                     struct bio *bi;
> 498                     struct md_rdev *rdev;
> 499                     if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Wantwrite,
> &sh->dev[i].flags)) {
> 
> [] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [] raid5d+0x470/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 0x8d80 is in raid5d (/mnt/work/alex/Ubuntu-3.2.0-25.40/drivers/md/raid5.c:4306).
> 4301                    handled++;
> 4302                    handle_stripe(sh);
> 4303                    release_stripe(sh);
> 4304                    cond_resched();
> 4305
> 4306                    if (mddev->flags & ~(1<<MD_CHANGE_PENDING))
> 4307                            md_check_recovery(mddev);
> 4308
> 4309                    spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
> 4310            }
> 
> [] md_wakeup_thread+0x28/0x30
> [] __release_stripe+0x101/0x1d0 [raid456]
> [] release_stripe+0x4d/0x60 [raid456]
> [] raid5d+0x46b/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> 0x1be1 is in __release_stripe
> (/mnt/work/alex/Ubuntu-3.2.0-25.40/drivers/md/raid5.c:227).
> 222                                     if (conf->retry_read_aligned)
> 223
> md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
> 224                             }
> 225                     }
> 226             }
> 227     }
> 228
> 229     static void release_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
> 230     {
> 231             struct r5conf *conf = sh->raid_conf;
> 
> [] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [] handle_stripe+0x5dc/0x1d80 [raid456]
> [] raid5d+0x463/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 0x5bbc is in handle_stripe
> (/usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.0-25-generic/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:121).
> 116      * clear_bit() is atomic and implies release semantics before the memory
> 117      * operation. It can be used for an unlock.
> 118      */
> 119     static inline void clear_bit_unlock(unsigned nr, volatile
> unsigned long *addr)
> 120     {
> 121             barrier();
> 122             clear_bit(nr, addr);
> 123     }
> 124
> 125     static inline void __clear_bit(int nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
> 
> [] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40
> [] handle_stripe+0xde/0x1d80 [raid456]
> [] raid5d+0x463/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> 0x56be is in handle_stripe (include/linux/spinlock.h:310).
> 305             raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(spinlock_check(lock),
> nest_lock);       \
> 306     } while (0)
> 307
> 308     static inline void spin_lock_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
> 309     {
> 310             raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->rlock);
> 311     }
> 312
> 313     #define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)                          \
> 314     do {
> 
> [] md_wakeup_thread+0x28/0x30
> [] __release_stripe+0x101/0x1d0 [raid456]
> [] release_stripe+0x42/0x60 [raid456]
> [] raid5d+0x46b/0x650 [raid456]
> [] md_thread+0x10e/0x140
> [] kthread+0x8c/0xa0
> [] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> 0x1cf2 is in release_stripe (include/linux/spinlock.h:340).
> 335             raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->rlock);
> 336     }
> 337
> 338     static inline void spin_unlock_irqrestore(spinlock_t *lock,
> unsigned long flags)
> 339     {
> 340             raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->rlock, flags);
> 341     }
> 342
> 343     static inline int spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock)
> 344     {
> 
> Can you pls advise what might be the issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex.


sorry, but nothing occurs to me that might be the cause.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-29  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 10:59 md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync Alexander Lyakas
2013-07-28  6:30 ` Alexander Lyakas
2013-07-29  5:25 ` NeilBrown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130729152522.63c35e5c@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.bolshoy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shyam@zadarastorage.com \
    --cc=vladimir@zadarastorage.com \
    --cc=yair@zadarastorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).