Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Nathan Shearer <mail@nathanshearer.ca>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:21:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130901192149.6f119180@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5223012C.2090207@nathanshearer.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4386 bytes --]

On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:56:12 -0600 Nathan Shearer <mail@nathanshearer.ca>
wrote:

> Hi, I've run into a problem recovering my array from a server power 
> failure. I'll try to keep it short so here is a sequence of events:
> 
>  1. Running a healthy 4-disk RAID5 array (on server-01).
>  2. Added a 5th drive and grow the array to a 5-disk RAID6 array (backup
>     file stored on a separate RAID1 array on other disks)
>  3. Grow begins and passes the critical section, gets to ~15% complete
>     and power to the server fails

When growing a 4-disk RAID5 to a 5-disk RAID6 the entire process is in the
"critical section".  This is because it is always writing to location where
live data is.
When increasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section
at the start.
When decreasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section
at the end.
But when you don't change the number of data drives as in this case, it is
all critical and all needs a backup.

>  4. I then move all 5 drives to backup server. The RAID5/6 array
>     assembles and grow continues (without backup file since it's on
>     server-01)

That shouldn't work.  It shouldn't start without the backup file.

>  5. I begin copying data off of that array onto a separate array --
>     filesystem and data is consistent :)
>  6. Power restored to server-01
>  7. Safely stop the growing array with mdadm --stop
>  8. Move 5 drives back into server-01
>  9. Attempt mdadm --assemble and I get:
>     # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9
>     mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
>            Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-file

That should have happened on server-02

> 10. Attempt with the original backup file:
>     # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 --backup-file
>     /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
>     mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
> 
> So when I enable --verbose I get:
> 
>     mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
>     needs to be restored
>     mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
>     mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
>            Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-file
> 
> When I provide the backup file I get:
> 
>     mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
>     needs to be restored
>     mdadm: too-old timestamp on backup-metadata on
>     /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
>     mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
>     mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
> 
> When I tell it to use the "old" backup file I get:
> 
>     # export MDADM_GROW_ALLOW_OLD=1
>     # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 -vv --backup-file
>     /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
>     mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
>     needs to be restored
>     mdadm: accepting backup with timestamp 1377794387 for array with
>     timestamp 1377904444
>     mdadm: backup-metadata found on /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
>     but is not needed
>     mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
>     mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
> 
> OK, so the backup file is not needed. I assume this is because the 
> critical section was passed long ago, but then why is it attempting to 
> find and restore the backup file when it is provided and also not 
> needed? I have not tried a --force because I don't want to trash my 
> array if there is another better option that I can still try. Any ideas? 
> Is this potentially a bug in mdadm where this kind of array state is not 
> expected?
> 

The content of the backup file is not needed as it is (presumably) before the
place where the reshape has proceeded to.

The backup is only needed after an unclean shutdown.  Presumably you had an
unclean shutdown when server-01 lost power, so that could have resulted in
corruption and shouldn't have restarted easily on server-02.

However as the shutdown on server-02 was clean there would be no further
corruption.
You can start the array by giving a backup file (it can be empty) and
specifying  --invalid-backup.  This  tells mdadm not to bother if it cannot
restore the critical section but to just keep going.

NeilBrown



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-01  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-01  8:56 Failed to find backup of critical section Nathan Shearer
2013-09-01  9:21 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-09-01 10:25   ` Nathan Shearer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130901192149.6f119180@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@nathanshearer.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox