From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: keld@keldix.com Subject: Re: Linux MD? Or an H710p? Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:29:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20131022152957.GC5580@www5.open-std.org> References: <526328AE.2020908@gmail.com> <21093.14265.261728.755087@quad.stoffel.home> <5265C89A.4000908@gmail.com> <52662849.1080003@hesbynett.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52662849.1080003@hesbynett.no> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: Steve Bergman , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids It would be nice if we could get some benchmarks on this. I would be inetersted in also figures from a standard raid10,far configuration. best regards keld On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 09:24:57AM +0200, David Brown wrote: > On 22/10/13 02:36, Steve Bergman wrote: > > > > > But hey, this is going to be a very nice opportunity for observing XFS's > > savvy with parallel i/o. > > You mentioned using a 6-drive RAID10 in your first email, with XFS on > top of that. Stan is the expert here, but my understanding is that you > should go for three 2-drive RAID1 pairs, and then use an md linear > "raid" for these pairs and put XFS on top of that in order to get the > full benefits of XFS parallelism. > > mvh., > > David > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html