From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: [Question] how to proceed after bad raid5 reshape Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 04:16:40 +0600 Message-ID: <20131023041640.0e8ae338@natsu> References: <5266F5F8.4040503@woh.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/hzj5Eu_2968xFqYlsArgNEG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5266F5F8.4040503@woh.rr.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Knight Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/hzj5Eu_2968xFqYlsArgNEG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:02:32 -0400 Dan Knight wrote: > Checking mdadm -Evvvvs shows that maybe 2 drives went bad during the=20 > reshape? And maybe, just maybe, `dmesg` would have something about this, if this ind= eed happened. But of course asking people on the internet to play with you an exciting game of guesswork is much more exciting than looking at the actual log which would simply and boringly TELL you what exactly happened... --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/hzj5Eu_2968xFqYlsArgNEG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJm+UgACgkQTLKSvz+PZwjaEgCfXjRXX+bKQr+FPi7+WPpKbfgv VRMAnRN/xlIMDB4bFz+dP9HNUUBk5dVT =HbuJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hzj5Eu_2968xFqYlsArgNEG--