From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: dmaengine 3.13 v2 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 21:58:13 +0530 Message-ID: <20131117162813.GJ8834@intel.com> References: <20131116065213.GI8834@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , Dave Jiang , linux-raid , Jon Mason , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:37:38AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Nov 15, 2013 11:48 PM, "Vinod Koul" wrote: > > > While the dmaengine-v2 has: > > > > commit 82a1402eaee5dab1f3ab2d5aa4c316451374c5af > > Author: Ezequiel Garcia > > Date: Wed Oct 30 12:01:43 2013 -0300 > > > > Which also explains the diff I got with test. I have pushed my merge to > > dan_merge2 for your ref. You next branch also doesnt show this commit and > these > > are missing below. I guess we need this for the fix. Looks like you tagged > > without these patches. I can go ahead and merge commit > > bad6f9dba84e7ddc448f306ce4b289dcaa95b9f9 directly if you want. > > No, use the tag directly. We're still sorting those ntb patches out > internally and I accidentally included them in the test branch. Fine, I have pushed now as next, pls do verify > > Thanks! > > Sent from my phone so excuse HTML Looks like you managed to send this one nicely taht too inlined well :) -- ~Vinod