From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "David F." <df7729@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MDADM 3.3 broken?
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:48:33 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120114833.695fc9d4@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRSmLs8AXqTG9Y0YU46vtpb2q08-2ApknBHVPF75FXPJu7C0Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 916 bytes --]
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:35:44 -0800 "David F." <df7729@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, we confirmed that it appears to be the old RAID1 data it was
> finding - when the partition is below half the size it didn't find it
> in the partition, when resized just beyond half the size (of the RAID0
> md drive), it then started finding it in the partition.
>
> Also, was Cisco's information useful for why their cisco server (using
> lsi) RAID5 won't assembly? Do you think the patch deals with that as
> well?
>
>
You did say something about Cisco in the original post but it wasn't at all
clear what you were asking or what the context was.
Could you please spell it all out. You said something about dmraid reporting
something. Showing the output of dmraid in that case wouldn't hurt.
And show the output of "mdadm --examine /dev/device" for any relevant device
is often a good idea.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-18 18:26 MDADM 3.3 broken? David F.
2013-11-18 20:22 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-18 23:13 ` David F.
2013-11-19 0:01 ` NeilBrown
2013-11-19 17:05 ` David F.
2013-11-19 20:38 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-19 22:34 ` David F.
2013-11-19 22:49 ` David F.
2013-11-19 19:45 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-19 20:08 ` David F.
2013-11-19 23:51 ` NeilBrown
2013-11-20 0:22 ` David F.
2013-11-20 0:35 ` David F.
2013-11-20 0:48 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2013-11-20 1:29 ` David F.
2013-11-20 1:34 ` David F.
2013-11-20 2:30 ` NeilBrown
2013-11-20 6:41 ` David F.
2013-11-20 23:15 ` David F.
2013-11-21 20:50 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-21 21:10 ` David F.
2013-11-21 21:30 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-21 22:39 ` David F.
2013-11-25 21:39 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-21 20:46 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-21 21:06 ` David F.
2013-11-21 23:05 ` David F.
2013-11-21 23:09 ` David F.
2013-11-22 3:06 ` David F.
2013-11-22 18:36 ` David F.
2013-11-23 23:36 ` David F.
2013-11-25 21:56 ` Martin Wilck
2013-11-26 0:24 ` David F.
2013-11-26 21:59 ` David F.
2013-11-27 22:40 ` Martin Wilck
2013-12-06 1:53 ` David F.
2013-12-07 2:28 ` David F.
2013-12-07 3:16 ` NeilBrown
2013-12-07 3:46 ` David F.
2013-12-14 21:01 ` David F.
2014-01-20 4:34 ` NeilBrown
2014-01-20 21:52 ` Martin Wilck
2014-01-20 23:54 ` David F.
2014-01-22 22:32 ` David F.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131120114833.695fc9d4@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=df7729@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwilck@arcor.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).