From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piergiorgio Sartor Subject: Re: Triple parity and beyond Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:10:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20131123221024.GA10555@lazy.lzy> References: <20131120222903.GA3654@lazy.lzy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrea Mazzoleni Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor , Linux RAID Mailing List , Btrfs BTRFS , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Brown , David Smith List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi Andrea, On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 08:55:08AM +0100, Andrea Mazzoleni wrote: > Hi Piergiorgio, > > > How about par2? How does this work? > I checked the matrix they use, and sometimes it contains some singular > square submatrix. > It seems that in GF(2^16) these cases are just less common. Maybe they > were just unnoticed. > > Anyway, this seems to be an already known problem for PAR2, with an > hypothetical PAR3 fixing it: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/parchive/discussion/96282/thread/d3c6597b/ you did a pretty damn good research work! Maybe you should consider to contact them too. I'm not sure if your approach can be extended to GF(2^16), I guess yes, in that case they might be interested too. bye, -- piergiorgio