From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:52:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131206225252.GE15060@animx.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202084859.GA26327@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
Robin Hill wrote:
> On Sun Dec 01, 2013 at 10:07:07PM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
>
> > This is a general question, but I'll give a specific.
> >
> > If I create an array with assume clean and proceed to write to the device,
> > what happens with the parity?
> >
> Doing that specifically should result in all parity being correct, yes.
> Providing the writes are not going to a single disk in a stripe (in
> which case read-modify-write may be used to update the parity rather
> than a full stripe read and parity recalculation) then any write should
> result in the parity for that stripe being written correctly. I think
> RMW is only used in RAID5 currently though.
I tested with raid6 as I mentioned in the command in the original mail. I
ran a check and there were no mismatches.
I also created a raid5 on the same amount of disks and tried again. I only
wrote about 4gb and the mismatch count was 0 until it passed the 4gb mark.
I was fairly certain that it would be correct, but I wanted to check.
> Changing the stripe cache size won't affect the parity calculation at
> all (except in terms of performance/throughput).
I wasn't sure if that would make a difference or not. Doesn't hurt to ask.
Thanks for the response.
I must say that I've been a user of mdadm/linux software raid for some time
now and I've only once lost an entire array. I appreciate seeing all the
responses I've seen on the list over the years about how helpful everyone
has been.
--
Microsoft has beaten Volkswagen's world record. Volkswagen only created 22
million bugs.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 3:07 Creating new raid5 or 6 with --assume-clean Wakko Warner
2013-12-02 8:48 ` Robin Hill
2013-12-06 22:52 ` Wakko Warner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131206225252.GE15060@animx.eu.org \
--to=wakko@animx.eu.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).