From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dmcrypt on top of raid5, or raid5 on top of dmcrypt?
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:36:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140416223640.GA5164@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411195953.GN9923@merlins.org>
Anyone? :)
Clearly I can't be the only person using md raid5 and dmcrypt, right? :)
If you are, how did you build yours?
Thanks,
Marc
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:59:53PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> I have a btrfs filesystem with many many files which got slow likely due to
> btrfs optimization issues, but someone pointed out that I should also look
> at write amplification problems.
>
> This is my current array:
> gargamel:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md8
> /dev/md8:
> Version : 1.2
> Creation Time : Thu Mar 25 20:15:00 2010
> Raid Level : raid5
> Array Size : 7814045696 (7452.05 GiB 8001.58 GB)
> Used Dev Size : 1953511424 (1863.01 GiB 2000.40 GB)
> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> Intent Bitmap : Internal
> Layout : left-symmetric
> Chunk Size : 512K < I guess this is too big
>
> http://superuser.com/questions/305716/bad-performance-with-linux-software-raid5-and-luks-encryption
> says:
> "LUKS has a botleneck, that is it just spawns one thread per block device.
>
> Are you placing the encryption on top of the RAID 5? Then from the point of
> view of your OS you just have one device, then it is using just one thread
> for all those disks, meaning disks are working in a serial way rather than
> parallel."
> but it was disputed in a reply.
> Does someone know if this is still valid/correct in 3.14?
>
> Since I'm going to recreate the filesystem considering the troubles I've had
> with it, I might as well do it better this time :)
> (but doing the copy back will take days, so I'd rather get it right the first time)
>
> How would you recommend I create the array when I rebuild it?
>
> This filesystem contains may backup with many files, most small, and ideally
> identical stuff is hardlinked together (many files, many hardlinks)
> gargamel:~# btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs_pool2
> Data, single: total=3.28TiB, used=2.29TiB
> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=384.00KiB
> System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=0.00
> Metadata, DUP: total=74.50GiB, used=70.11GiB <<< muchos metadata
> Metadata, single: total=8.00MiB, used=0.00
>
>
> #1 move the intent bitmap to another device. I have /boot on swraid1 with
> ext4, so I'll likely use this (man page says ext3 only, but I hope ext4
> is good too, right?)
> #2 change chunk size to something smaller? 128K better?
> #3 anything else?
>
> Then, I used this for dmcrypt:
> cryptsetup luksFormat --align-payload=8192 -s 256 -c aes-xts-plain64
>
> The align-payload was good for my SSD, but probably not for a hard drive.
> http://wiki.drewhess.com/wiki/Creating_an_encrypted_filesystem_on_a_partition
> says
> "To calculate this value, multiply your RAID chunk size in bytes by the
> number of data disks in the array (N/2 for RAID 1, N-1 for RAID 5 and N-2
> for RAID 6), and divide by 512 bytes per sector."
>
> So 512K * 4 / 512 = 4K
> In other words, I can do align-payload=4096 for a small reduction of write
> amplification, or =1024 if I change my raid chunk size to 128K
>
> Correct?
> Do you recommend that I indeed rebuild that raid5 with a chunk size of 128K?
>
> Other bits I found that can maybe help others:
> http://superuser.com/questions/305716/bad-performance-with-linux-software-raid5-and-luks-encryption
>
> This seems to help work around the write amplification a bit:
> for i in /sys/block/md*/md/stripe_cache_size; do echo 16384 > $i; done
>
> This looks like an easy thing, done.
>
> If you have other suggestions/comments, please share :)
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
> --
> "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
> Microsoft is to operating systems ....
> .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
> Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-11 19:59 dmcrypt on top of raid5, or raid5 on top of dmcrypt? Marc MERLIN
2014-04-16 22:36 ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
2014-04-17 8:05 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140416223640.GA5164@merlins.org \
--to=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).