linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Manibalan P <pmanibalan@amiindia.co.in>,
	linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid6 - data integrity issue - data mis-compare on rebuilding RAID 6 - with 100 Mb resync speed.
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 17:21:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140505172110.73667211@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gg6N_FYOZmooXTUYT22AOuBmqFuin_TiKqn8A9DOCnqw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1885 bytes --]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:02:00 -0700 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:07 AM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:41:12 +0530 "Manibalan P" <pmanibalan@amiindia.co.in>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Neil,
> >>
> >> Also, I found the data corruption issue on RHEL 6.5.
> >>
> >> For your kind attention, I up-ported the md code [raid5.c + raid5.h]
> >> from FC11 kernel to CentOS 6.4, and there is no mis-compare with the
> >> up-ported code.
> >
> > This narrows it down to between 2.6.29 and 2.6.32 - is that correct?
> >
> > So it is probably the change to RAID6 to support async parity calculations.
> >
> > Looking at the code always makes my head spin.
> >
> > Dan : have you any ideas?
> >
> > It seems that writing to a double-degraded RAID6 while it is recovering to
> > a space can trigger data corruption.
> >
> > 2.6.29 works
> > 2.6.32 doesn't
> > 3.8.0 still doesn't.
> >
> > I suspect async parity calculations.
> 
> I'll take a look.  I've had cleanups of that code on my backlog for "a
> while now (TM)".


Hi Dan,
 did you have a chance to have a look?

I've been consistently failing to find anything.

I have a question though.
If we set up a chain of async dma handling via:
   ops_run_compute6_2 then ops_bio_drain then ops_run_reconstruct

is it possible for the ops_complete_compute callback set up by
ops_run_compute6_2 to be called before ops_run_reconstruct has been scheduled
or run?

If so, there seems to be some room for confusion over the setting for
R5_UPTODATE on blocks that are being computed and then drained to.  Both will
try to set the flag, so it could get set before reconstruction has run.

I can't see that this would cause a problem, but then I'm not entirely sure
why we clear R5_UPTODATE when we set R5_Wantdrain.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-05  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11 12:11 raid6 - data integrity issue - data mis-compare on rebuilding RAID 6 - with 100 Mb resync speed Manibalan P
2014-04-23  7:07 ` NeilBrown
2014-04-23 17:02   ` Dan Williams
2014-05-05  7:21     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-05-16 18:11       ` Dan Williams
2014-05-20  0:22         ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 11:47           ` Manibalan P
2014-05-22 11:52           ` Manibalan P
2014-04-23  9:19 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2014-04-23  9:25   ` Manibalan P
2014-04-23  9:30     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2014-04-23  9:33       ` Manibalan P
2014-04-23  9:45         ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2014-04-23  9:59           ` Manibalan P
2014-04-23 10:03             ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-24 13:15 Manibalan P
2014-03-12  7:39 Manibalan P
2014-03-13  6:19 ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140505172110.73667211@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmanibalan@amiindia.co.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).