linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:23:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda> (raw)

My static checker complains that if "num_raid_params" is UINT_MAX then
the "if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {" check doesn't work as intended.

The other change is that I moved the "if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2))"
condition forward a few lines so it was before the call to
context_alloc().  If we had an integer overflow inside that function
then it would lead to an immediate crash.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
Static checker stuff.  Not tested.

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index 4880b69..e0d53fe 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	argv++;
 
 	/* Skip over RAID params for now and find out # of devices */
-	if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {
+	if (num_raid_params >= argc) {
 		ti->error = "Arguments do not agree with counts given";
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1200,6 +1200,12 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
+	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
+		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	rs = context_alloc(ti, rt, (unsigned)num_raid_devs);
 	if (IS_ERR(rs))
 		return PTR_ERR(rs);
@@ -1208,16 +1214,8 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;
 
-	ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
 	argv += num_raid_params + 1;
 
-	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
-		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
-		goto bad;
-	}
-
 	ret = dev_parms(rs, argv);
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;

             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-29  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-29  8:23 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2014-10-21 12:43 ` [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).