From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mamedov Subject: Re: RAID newbie, 1 vs 5, chunk sizes Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:34:33 +0600 Message-ID: <20140618233433.20b43198@natsu> References: <539E5504.1080809@turmel.org> <2036850.atdiKx507N@eseries.newtech.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/0DTY9qHpML+Gq3VjFtpK3vW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mathias =?UTF-8?B?QnVyw6lu?= Cc: dag@newtech.fi, Nuno =?UTF-8?B?TWFnYWxow6Nlcw==?= , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids --Sig_/0DTY9qHpML+Gq3VjFtpK3vW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:58:59 +0100 Mathias Bur=C3=A9n wrote: > If we're comparing drives, my 8x WD20EARS / EARX have been spinning > for years. 2 drives just failed after ~3.4 years uptime (24/7) and > over 400,000 head parkings. They had weekly SMART self-test and > monthly RAID6 scrubs, and a few unexpected power losses. Good value. Why do you hate your drives so much, or haven't you heard of 'wdidle3'? Or maybe I misunderstand and this whole endeavor was actually an experiment= on how soon will they fail from all that ridiculous amount of head parkings. --=20 With respect, Roman --Sig_/0DTY9qHpML+Gq3VjFtpK3vW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOhzakACgkQTLKSvz+PZwj3pgCfS5elJslyd8GgU0XskldNmDSA Wy8AnRCQdLINP9ZQCWG0XS399bjzIp/R =V7eu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0DTY9qHpML+Gq3VjFtpK3vW--