linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
To: "P. Gautschi" <linuxlist@gautschi.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bad sequential performance of RAID5 with a lot of disk seeks
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:05:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007110526.GD18786@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141007123619.Horde.tC2-gMUttC5BYOoaKogzlw9@webmail.gautschi.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1763 bytes --]

On Tue Oct 07, 2014 at 12:36:19PM +0200, P. Gautschi wrote:

> > What does the SMART info show for the drives - are there any reallocated
> > blocks? A large number of those scattered over the disk would certainly
> > cause seeking for both reads and writes.
> 
> I will check the SMART this evening but I don't think that this is causing
> the seek. The sound is very constant and for the whole time of syncing  
> the array.
> I will also run a dd on the disk to compare.
> 
> > It's also worth checking whether there's anything else that would be
> > accessing the disks in the background (monitoring/indexing/etc).
> 
> Unlikely because I have not yet created a filesystem after setting up  
> the RAID4.
> 
> > I can't think of anything else that would be causing reads to seek - SMR
> > disks or write-intent bitmaps would only affect writes.
> 
> Exactly
> 
> Is there any way or tool to monitor all disk read/write commands - not only
> the count or amount but every access with LBA and length?
> 
You can do:
    echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump

That will write out all disk IO to the kernel log (process ID,
read/write and block offset only though). It can be very verbose,
especially if you have a lot of other things running on the system, but
you should be able to grep out the necessary lines. Echoing 0 will
switch it back off again.

Otherwise there's probably ways to get more specific results via the
kernel auditing system, but that's nothing I've played with.

Cheers,
    Robin
-- 
     ___        
    ( ' }     |       Robin Hill        <robin@robinhill.me.uk> |
   / / )      | Little Jim says ....                            |
  // !!       |      "He fallen in de water !!"                 |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-07  4:44 Bad sequential performance of RAID5 with a lot of disk seeks P. Gautschi
2014-10-07  7:43 ` Robin Hill
2014-10-07  7:54   ` P. Gautschi
2014-10-07  9:25     ` Robin Hill
2014-10-07 10:36       ` P. Gautschi
2014-10-07 11:05         ` Robin Hill [this message]
2014-10-08  9:05 ` XiaoNi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141007110526.GD18786@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk \
    --to=robin@robinhill.me.uk \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxlist@gautschi.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).