From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:43:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141021124354.GB26918@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda>
These array overflows are still there in linux-next.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:23:23AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> My static checker complains that if "num_raid_params" is UINT_MAX then
> the "if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {" check doesn't work as intended.
>
> The other change is that I moved the "if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2))"
> condition forward a few lines so it was before the call to
> context_alloc(). If we had an integer overflow inside that function
> then it would lead to an immediate crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> Static checker stuff. Not tested.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> index 4880b69..e0d53fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> argv++;
>
> /* Skip over RAID params for now and find out # of devices */
> - if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {
> + if (num_raid_params >= argc) {
> ti->error = "Arguments do not agree with counts given";
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1200,6 +1200,12 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
> + if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
> + ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> rs = context_alloc(ti, rt, (unsigned)num_raid_devs);
> if (IS_ERR(rs))
> return PTR_ERR(rs);
> @@ -1208,16 +1214,8 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
> if (ret)
> goto bad;
>
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> -
> - argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
> argv += num_raid_params + 1;
>
> - if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
> - ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
> - goto bad;
> - }
> -
> ret = dev_parms(rs, argv);
> if (ret)
> goto bad;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-29 8:23 [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows Dan Carpenter
2014-10-21 12:43 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141021124354.GB26918@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).