* [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits @ 2014-10-25 0:55 Justin Maggard 2014-10-28 22:19 ` NeilBrown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Justin Maggard @ 2014-10-25 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid; +Cc: Justin Maggard If the request --size to --grow an array to is larger than 32bits, then mdadm may make the wrong choice and use ioctl instead of setting component_size via sysfs and the change is ignored. Instead of using casts to check for a 32-bit overflow, just check for set bits outside of INT32_MAX. --- Grow.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c index a9c8589..a614102 100644 --- a/Grow.c +++ b/Grow.c @@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, if (s->size == MAX_SIZE) s->size = 0; array.size = s->size; - if (array.size != (signed)s->size) { + if (s->size & ~INT32_MAX) { /* got truncated to 32bit, write to * component_size instead */ -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits 2014-10-25 0:55 [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits Justin Maggard @ 2014-10-28 22:19 ` NeilBrown 2014-10-28 23:47 ` Justin Maggard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2014-10-28 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Maggard; +Cc: linux-raid [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1118 bytes --] On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:55:02 -0700 Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com> wrote: > If the request --size to --grow an array to is larger > than 32bits, then mdadm may make the wrong choice and > use ioctl instead of setting component_size via sysfs > and the change is ignored. Can you explain exactly why the current code is not sufficient? When does it fail? If you include the explanation in a re-submission of the patch, and I am convinced, then I will gladly apply your patch. Thanks, NeilBrown > > Instead of using casts to check for a 32-bit overflow, > just check for set bits outside of INT32_MAX. > --- > Grow.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c > index a9c8589..a614102 100644 > --- a/Grow.c > +++ b/Grow.c > @@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, > if (s->size == MAX_SIZE) > s->size = 0; > array.size = s->size; > - if (array.size != (signed)s->size) { > + if (s->size & ~INT32_MAX) { > /* got truncated to 32bit, write to > * component_size instead > */ [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits 2014-10-28 22:19 ` NeilBrown @ 2014-10-28 23:47 ` Justin Maggard 2014-10-29 0:05 ` NeilBrown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Justin Maggard @ 2014-10-28 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: NeilBrown; +Cc: linux-raid On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:55:02 -0700 Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If the request --size to --grow an array to is larger >> than 32bits, then mdadm may make the wrong choice and >> use ioctl instead of setting component_size via sysfs >> and the change is ignored. > > Can you explain exactly why the current code is not sufficient? When does > it fail? > If you include the explanation in a re-submission of the patch, and I am > convinced, then I will gladly apply your patch. > To be honest, I can't figure out how the current comparison would have ever worked at all. To illustrate, here's a simple test program: ----- $ ./test 0xfffffffff cast comparison did not detect truncation bit comparison detected truncation $ cat test.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdint.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { unsigned long long ssize = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0); int asize; asize = ssize; if (asize != (signed)ssize) printf("cast comparison detected truncation\n"); else printf("cast comparison did not detect truncation \n"); if (ssize & ~INT32_MAX) printf("bit comparison detected truncation\n"); else printf("bit comparison did not detect truncation \n"); return 0; } ----- I plugged lots of numbers in there, and I was never able to get the current cast comparison to see a difference. I ran into the issue by trying to grow the component size of a RAID array from 1TB to 3TB, and it wouldn't work if I specified the size; only using "max" worked. I'm happy to re-submit if you'd like; I just thought it was a pretty straightforward bug. I guess what I'm saying is, I don't understand why there *should* be a difference between assigning a unsigned long long to an int variable, and casting that unsigned long long to a signed type. But -Justin > Thanks, > NeilBrown > >> >> Instead of using casts to check for a 32-bit overflow, >> just check for set bits outside of INT32_MAX. >> --- >> Grow.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c >> index a9c8589..a614102 100644 >> --- a/Grow.c >> +++ b/Grow.c >> @@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, >> if (s->size == MAX_SIZE) >> s->size = 0; >> array.size = s->size; >> - if (array.size != (signed)s->size) { >> + if (s->size & ~INT32_MAX) { >> /* got truncated to 32bit, write to >> * component_size instead >> */ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits 2014-10-28 23:47 ` Justin Maggard @ 2014-10-29 0:05 ` NeilBrown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2014-10-29 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Maggard; +Cc: linux-raid [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3219 bytes --] On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:47:06 -0700 Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:55:02 -0700 Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> If the request --size to --grow an array to is larger > >> than 32bits, then mdadm may make the wrong choice and > >> use ioctl instead of setting component_size via sysfs > >> and the change is ignored. > > > > Can you explain exactly why the current code is not sufficient? When does > > it fail? > > If you include the explanation in a re-submission of the patch, and I am > > convinced, then I will gladly apply your patch. > > > > To be honest, I can't figure out how the current comparison would have > ever worked at all. To illustrate, here's a simple test program: > ----- > $ ./test 0xfffffffff > cast comparison did not detect truncation > bit comparison detected truncation > > $ cat test.c > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <stdint.h> > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > unsigned long long ssize = strtoull(argv[1], NULL, 0); > int asize; > > asize = ssize; > if (asize != (signed)ssize) > printf("cast comparison detected truncation\n"); > else > printf("cast comparison did not detect truncation \n"); > if (ssize & ~INT32_MAX) > printf("bit comparison detected truncation\n"); > else > printf("bit comparison did not detect truncation \n"); > > return 0; > } > ----- > > I plugged lots of numbers in there, and I was never able to get the > current cast comparison to see a difference. > > I ran into the issue by trying to grow the component size of a RAID > array from 1TB to 3TB, and it wouldn't work if I specified the size; > only using "max" worked. > > I'm happy to re-submit if you'd like; I just thought it was a pretty > straightforward bug. I guess what I'm saying is, I don't understand > why there *should* be a difference between assigning a unsigned long > long to an int variable, and casting that unsigned long long to a > signed type. But > > -Justin > > > Thanks, > > NeilBrown > > > >> > >> Instead of using casts to check for a 32-bit overflow, > >> just check for set bits outside of INT32_MAX. > >> --- > >> Grow.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Grow.c b/Grow.c > >> index a9c8589..a614102 100644 > >> --- a/Grow.c > >> +++ b/Grow.c > >> @@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@ int Grow_reshape(char *devname, int fd, > >> if (s->size == MAX_SIZE) > >> s->size = 0; > >> array.size = s->size; > >> - if (array.size != (signed)s->size) { > >> + if (s->size & ~INT32_MAX) { > >> /* got truncated to 32bit, write to > >> * component_size instead > >> */ > > Thanks. Looks like I broke it in July. http://git.neil.brown.name/?p=mdadm.git;a=commitdiff;h=4e9a3dd16d656b269f5602624ac4f7109a571368 I probably should have made it if (s->size != (signed long long)s->size) I've applied your patch. Thanks, NeilBrown [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-29 0:05 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-25 0:55 [PATCH] Grow: fix resize of array component size to > 32bits Justin Maggard 2014-10-28 22:19 ` NeilBrown 2014-10-28 23:47 ` Justin Maggard 2014-10-29 0:05 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).