From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Anshuman Aggarwal <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:32:35 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141029123235.56910b68@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-d5dbdF160hoa1==jWxEQZRpwQ7Sa76=9MREmp2V6Y24U8Kw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:45:34 +0530
Anshuman Aggarwal <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm outlining below a proposal for a RAID device mapper virtual block
> device for the kernel which adds "split raid" functionality on an
> incremental batch basis for a home media server/archived content which
> is rarely accessed.
> Existing solutions considered:
Some of the already-available "home media server" setup schemes you did not
mention:
http://linuxconfig.org/prouhd-raid-for-the-end-user
a smart way of managing MD RAID given multiple devices of various sizes;
http://louwrentius.com/building-a-raid-6-array-of-mixed-drives.html
what to do with a set of mixed-size drives, in simpler terms;
https://romanrm.net/mhddfs
File-level "concatenation" of disks, with smart distribution of new files;
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-29 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-29 7:15 Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 7:32 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2014-10-29 8:31 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 9:05 ` NeilBrown
2014-10-29 9:25 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 19:27 ` Ethan Wilson
2014-10-30 14:57 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 17:25 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-10-31 11:05 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-31 14:25 ` Matt Garman
2014-11-01 12:55 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06 2:29 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 15:00 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-03 5:52 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-03 18:04 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06 2:24 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 7:29 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 22:50 ` NeilBrown
2014-11-26 6:24 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:00 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:34 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 21:46 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-02 11:56 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 16:25 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 21:49 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-17 6:40 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2015-01-06 11:40 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
[not found] ` <CAJvUf-BktH_E6jb5d94VuMVEBf_Be4i_8u_kBYU52Df1cu0gmg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-01 5:36 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141029123235.56910b68@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).